Cranford v. Narwarece

Filing 8

ORDER GRANTING 7 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDER TERMINATING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP as MOOT signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/20/2016. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARCHIE CRANFORD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 1:16-cv-00954-DAD-BAM (PC) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF No. 7) v. LAURA NARWARECE, 15 ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF No. 2) Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 20 ' 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code ' 6600 et seq. 21 are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 22 Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, signed 23 24 and dated July 12, 2016. (ECF No. 7.) Examination of these documents reveals that Plaintiff is 25 unable to afford the costs of this action. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED: 1. 26 27 and, 28 Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED; /// 1 1 2 2. Plaintiff’s previous, incomplete motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is TERMINATED AS MOOT. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara July 20, 2016 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?