Ortega v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
14
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/8/2017. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LUZ VERONICA ORTEGA,
16-cv-964 GSA
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, acting
Commissioner of Social Security,1
Defendant.
17
18
On March 25, 2016, Plaintiff filed a complaint requesting a review of the Commissioner
19
20
of Social Security’s denial of disability benefits. (Doc. 1). Pursuant to this Court’s scheduling
21
order issued on July 8, 2016, Plaintiff was required to file an opening brief no later than thirty
22
days after the service of the Commissioner’s confidential letter brief. (Doc. 5, pg. 2). The
23
Commissioner served its confidential letter brief on Plaintiff on January 26, 2017. (Doc. 13).
24
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due no later than February 27, 2017. To date, no
25
opening brief has been filed, and the parties have not stipulated to an extension of time.
26
27
1
28
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 25(d), Nancy A. Berryhill shall be substituted in for Carolyn W. Colvin, as Nancy
Berryhill is now the acting Commissioner of Social Security.
1
1
2
3
Therefore, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for a
failure to comply with this Court’s order. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a written response to this
Order to Show Cause WITHIN twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff should
4
include any request for additional time to file the brief if needed in the response.
5
6
7
Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause within the time specified may result
in dismissal of this action, monetary or other sanctions.
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 8, 2017
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?