Mendoza v. General Motors LLC et al

Filing 124

ORDER on Stipulation Regarding Plaintiff's Dismissal of GM Entities and Breach of Warranty Claims, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/24/2018. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Thomas Scarvie B SBN 54499
SCARVIE LAW GROUP
P.O. Box 2438
Yountville, California 94599
Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Raymond Paul Johnson B SBN 110784
RAYMOND PAUL JOHNSON, A LAW CORPORATION
2121 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 3375
El Segundo, California 90245
Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Richard O. McConville B Pro hac vice
COPPOLA, MCCONVILLE, COPPOLA, CARROLL,
HOCKENBERG & SCALISE, P.C.
2100 Westown Parkway, Suite 210
West Des Moines, Iowa 50265
Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MIRIAM MICHELLE MENDOZA

13
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

FRESNO DIVISION

18
19 MIRIAM MICHELLE MENDOZA
Plaintiff,

20
vs.

21
22

GENERAL MOTORS, LLC,
23
Defendant.
24

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00967-LJO-JLT
Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill
Chief U.S. District Judge
STIPULATIONS REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S DISMISSALS OF
GM ENTITIES AND BREACH OF
WARRANTY CLAIMS;
[Proposed] ORDER
F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(ii)
USDC- E.D. Cal. Local Rule 143

25

Final Pretrial
Conference: October 11, 2018
Trial Date:
October 16, 2018

26
27
28
-1Mendoza

STIPULATION RE PLTFF=S DISMISSALS; ORDER

1

TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS:
The respective parties to this action, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby

2
3

stipulate and agree as follows:

4
STIPULATIONS REGARDNG PLAINTIFF’S DISMISSALS

5
1.

6

Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff

7

MICHELLE MENDOZA hereby dismisses from this action the following entities named as

8

defendants in Plaintiff’s operative First-Amended Complaint:
General Motors Corporation

9
10

Chevrolet Division of General Motors

11

Motors Liquidation Company

12

2.

Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff

13

MICHELLE MENDOZA hereby dismisses in this action her claims and cause of action for Breach

14

of Implied Warranty against Defendant General Motors, LLC.
3.

15
16

Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 10(a), and the USDC-E.D.

Cal. Local Rules, Rule 133(g), the title of this action on all pleadings and other documents shall be:
MIRIAM MICHELLE MENDOZA vs. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

[Signatures follow on next page.]

26

///

27

///

28

///
-2Mendoza

STIPULATION RE PLTFF=S DISMISSALS; ORDER

1
2

DATED: September 14, 2018
SCARVIE LAW GROUP

3
RAYMOND PAUL JOHNSON, A LAW CORPORATION
4
and
5
COPPOLA, MCCONVILLE, COPPOLA, CARROLL,
HOCKENBERG & SCALISE, P.C.

6
7
8

By:

9

/s/ Raymond Paul Johnson
Thomas Scarvie  Raymond Paul Johnson
Richard O. McConville
Attorneys for Plaintiff

10
11
12

DATED: September 12, 2018
KLEIN THOMAS

13
14
By:
15

/s/ Stephanie L. Chilton
Stephanie L. Chilton  Thomas M. Klein
Attorneys for Defendant GM, LLC

16
17
18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

September 24, 2018

_____

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3Mendoza

STIPULATION RE PLTFF=S DISMISSALS; ORDER