Mendoza v. General Motors LLC et al
Filing
51
ORDER AFTER TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/5/2017. Defendant's expert disclosure by 12/27/2017; plaintiff's rebuttal expert disclosure by 1/24/2018. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadline: Filed by 2/28/2018; Hearing by 3/28/2018. Motion for Extension (Doc. 35 ) is TERMINATED. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MIRIAM MICHELLE MENDOZA,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
GENERAL MOTORS LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
) Case No.: 1:16-cv-0967 - LJO - JLT
)
) ORDER AFTER TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
The Court held a telephonic conference related to the defendants’ motion for additional time to
18
disclose their experts. (See Doc. 35) During the conference, counsel agreed that the defendants would
19
have four additional weeks to make the disclosure despite that the defendants preferred six weeks.
20
This agreement was with the understanding that the plaintiff would have additional time to make her
21
rebuttal disclosures and that the non-dispositive motions deadline would be extended. Thus, the Court
22
orders:
1.
23
24
The defendants SHALL disclose their experts no later than December 27, 2017 and
the plaintiff SHALL disclose any rebuttal experts no later than January 24, 2018;
2.
25
Non-dispositive motions SHALL be filed no later than February 28, 2018 and heard
26
no later than March 28, 2018;
27
///
28
///
1
1
3.
Defendants’ motion for the six-week extension is TERMINATED.
2
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 5, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?