Charles Windham v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 19

ORDER Granting 18 Defendant's Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/28/17. Response to Complaint Deadline: 4/27/2017 (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 CHARLES WINDHAM, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 v. C. RODRIGUEZ, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-00979-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [ECF No. 18] Plaintiff Charles Windham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 14 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 15 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 16 Currently before the Court is Defendant Rodriguez’s first request for an extension of time to 17 respond to the complaint, filed March 28, 2017. (ECF No. 18.) Defense counsel declares in support 18 that about two weeks are needed to obtain documents and prepare a motion under Local Rule 151(b) 19 in response to the complaint. Defendant seeks an extension until April 27, 2017 to bring that motion. Good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s 20 21 complaint shall be filed and served on or before April 27, 2017. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 28, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?