Charles Windham v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 37

ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 36 Declaration, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/26/17. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CHARLES WINDHAM, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 C. RODRIGUEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-00979-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S DECLARATION (ECF No. 36) 17 18 Plaintiff Charles Windham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 20 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s declaration filed July 24, 2017, stating that it is filed in 22 support of this action and Plaintiff’s evidentiary hearing motion. (ECF No. 36.) Plaintiff declares that 23 certain habeas corpus law books, a directory of attorneys, and other unnamed files and books have 24 been removed from his cell after a search. 25 There is no pending evidentiary hearing motion in this matter, nor does this declaration appear 26 to relate to any other currently pending motion. As Plaintiff has been just recently informed, to submit 27 evidence in support of a request, the evidence should be attached to a proper filing, signed by Plaintiff, 28 that explains what the evidence is and for what purpose it should be considered. 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s declaration filed July 24, 2017, is 1 2 disregarded at this time. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 July 26, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?