Martin v. Sysco Corporation et al

Filing 19

ORDER re #18 Stipulated Protective Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/19/17. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JOHN MARTIN, Case No. 1:16-cv-00990-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, 9 ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER v. 10 (ECF No. 18) 11 SYSCO CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 12 13 On September 15, 2017, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. (ECF No. 18.) 14 15 Upon review of the parties’ stipulated protective order, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the 16 parties’ stipulated protective order is entered. However, the parties are advised that pursuant to 17 the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, any 18 documents which are to be filed under seal will require a written request which complies 19 with Local Rule 141. The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be 20 required to show good cause for documents attached to a nondispositive motion or 21 compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos v. Pacific 22 Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: September 19, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?