Martin v. Sysco Corporation et al

Filing 53

ORDER Granting #52 Stipulation for Class Notice, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/29/2018. (The proposed class notice (Doc. No. 52-1) is approved. Defendant shall provide class members' identifying information to ILYM Group, Inc. within ten (10) business days of the date of service of this order. ILYM Group shall send the notices within five (5) calendar days thereafter.)(Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 JOHN MARTIN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 13 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR CLASS NOTICE v. 14 15 No. 1:16-cv-00990-DAD-SAB SYSCO CORPORATION and SYSCO CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, INC., 16 (Doc. No. 52) Defendants. 17 On April 20, 2018, the court issued an order granting in part plaintiff’s motion for class 18 19 certification. (Doc. No. 44.) In that order, the court directed the parties to meet and confer to 20 ascertain whether a joint stipulated class notice and distribution plan was feasible. (Id. at 17.) 21 Following the granting of extensions of time, the parties submitted a joint proposed notice and 22 distribution plan on May 25, 2018. (Doc. No. 52.) The parties have agreed to engage ILYM 23 Group, Inc. as the class administrator. (Id. at ¶ 5.) Defendant will compile class members’ 24 identifying information and provide it to ILYM Group within ten (10) business days of an order 25 of this court approving the proposed notice, and ILYM Group will send the notices out within 26 five (5) calendar days of defendant providing that information. (Id. at ¶¶ 7–8.) Plaintiff will bear 27 the costs of mailing the notices. (Id. at ¶ 6.) 28 ///// 1 1 2 Rule 23 requires that any proposed class notice state the following “clearly and concisely . . . in plain, easily understood language”: 3 (i) the nature of the action; 4 (ii) the definition of the class certified; 5 (iii) the class claims, issues, or defenses; 6 (iv) that a class member may enter an appearance through an attorney if the member so desires; 7 8 (v) that the court will exclude from the class any member who requests exclusion; 9 (vi) the time and manner for requesting exclusion; and 10 (vii) the binding effect of a class judgment on members under Rule 23(c)(3). 11 12 Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(2)(B). The court has reviewed the proposed notice, and it includes each of 13 the items listed above in plain language. (Doc. No. 52-1.) Therefore, the court will approve the 14 proposed class notice. 15 The proposed class notice (Doc. No. 52-1) is approved. Defendant shall provide class 16 members’ identifying information to ILYM Group, Inc. within ten (10) business days of the date 17 of service of this order. ILYM Group shall send the notices within five (5) calendar days 18 thereafter. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: May 29, 2018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?