Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF. Defendants responsive pleading shall be filed on or before June 2, 2017; Plaintiffs reply, if any, shall be filed on or before, June 19, 2017; and The p arties are advised that due to the impact of social security cases on the Courts docket and the Courts desire to have cases decided in an expedient manner, requests for modification of the briefing scheduling will not routinely be granted and will on ly be granted upon a showing of good cause. Further, requests to modify the briefing schedule that are made on the eve of a deadline will be looked upon with disfavor and may be denied absent good cause for the delay in seeking an extension. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/1/2017. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
FRESNO DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, )
)
)
Defendant.
)
Case No.: 1:16-cv-01009-SAB
PATRICIA JOAN ANDERSON,
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S OPENING
BRIEF
(ECF No. 16)
17
18
19
On April 28, 2017, the parties to this action filed a stipulation for an extension of time for
the Commissioner to file a response to Plaintiff’s opening brief.
20
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
21
1.
Defendant’s responsive pleading shall be filed on or before June 2, 2017;
22
2.
Plaintiff’s reply, if any, shall be filed on or before, June 19, 2017; and
23
3.
The parties are advised that due to the impact of social security cases on the
24
Court’s docket and the Courts desire to have cases decided in an expedient
25
manner, requests for modification of the briefing scheduling will not routinely be
26
granted and will only be granted upon a showing of good cause. Further, requests
27
to modify the briefing schedule that are made on the eve of a deadline will be
28
1
1
looked upon with disfavor and may be denied absent good cause for the delay in
2
seeking an extension.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated:
May 1, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?