Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF. Defendants responsive pleading shall be filed on or before June 2, 2017; Plaintiffs reply, if any, shall be filed on or before, June 19, 2017; and The p arties are advised that due to the impact of social security cases on the Courts docket and the Courts desire to have cases decided in an expedient manner, requests for modification of the briefing scheduling will not routinely be granted and will on ly be granted upon a showing of good cause. Further, requests to modify the briefing schedule that are made on the eve of a deadline will be looked upon with disfavor and may be denied absent good cause for the delay in seeking an extension. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/1/2017. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) ) Defendant. ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-01009-SAB PATRICIA JOAN ANDERSON, ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S OPENING BRIEF (ECF No. 16) 17 18 19 On April 28, 2017, the parties to this action filed a stipulation for an extension of time for the Commissioner to file a response to Plaintiff’s opening brief. 20 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. Defendant’s responsive pleading shall be filed on or before June 2, 2017; 22 2. Plaintiff’s reply, if any, shall be filed on or before, June 19, 2017; and 23 3. The parties are advised that due to the impact of social security cases on the 24 Court’s docket and the Courts desire to have cases decided in an expedient 25 manner, requests for modification of the briefing scheduling will not routinely be 26 granted and will only be granted upon a showing of good cause. Further, requests 27 to modify the briefing schedule that are made on the eve of a deadline will be 28 1 1 looked upon with disfavor and may be denied absent good cause for the delay in 2 seeking an extension. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: May 1, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?