Hernandez v. Madden

Filing 11

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Obey With a Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/7/16. Show Cause Response Due Within Fourteen Days. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MARTIN V. HERNANDEZ,
Petitioner,

12
v.

13
14

RAYMOND D. MADDEN, Warden,
Respondent.

15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-01011-JLT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO OBEY WITH A COURT ORDER
[FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE]

17
18

On July 18, 2016, the Court screened the petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court found

19

that Petitioner had failed to state any claims for relief. The petition was dismissed and Petitioner was

20

directed to file a First Amended Petition within thirty days. Over thirty days have passed and

21

Petitioner has failed to comply or otherwise respond to the Court’s order. Local Rule 110 provides

22

that “a failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Local Rules or with any order of the Court

23

may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power

24

of the Court.”

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within 14 days of the date of

2

service of this order why the action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order and for

3

failure to state a cognizable claim.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 7, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2