Winn v. County of Kern et al
Filing
10
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/18/2016. Pleading Amendment Deadline 1/13/2017. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 11/4/2016; Non-Expert 7/24/2017; Expert 9/5/2017. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set f or 7/24/2017 at 08:15 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 9/19/2017; Hearing by 10/17/2017. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 11/3/2017; Hearing by 12/5/2017. Settlement Conference set for 9/11/2017 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 1/23/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Jury Trial set for 3/20/2018 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JAY WINN,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
v.
COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case: 1:16-CV-01021 - DAD - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 1/13/2017
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 11/4/2016
Non-Expert: 7/24/2017
Expert: 9/5/2017
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
7/24/2017 at 8:15 a.m.
16
17
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 9/19/2017
Hearing: 10/17/2017
18
19
Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 11/3/2017
Hearing: 12/5/2017
20
21
22
Settlement Conference:
9/11/2017 at 9:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
23
24
26
Pre-Trial Conference:
1/23/2018 at 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 5
27
Trial:
25
28
1
3/20/2018 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 5
Jury trial: 4-6 days
1
I.
October 17, 2016.
2
3
Date of Scheduling Conference
II.
Appearances of Counsel
4
Michael McGill appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.
5
James Brannen appeared on behalf of Defendants.
6
III.
Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
7
8
motion to amend, no later than January 13, 2017. Any motion to amend the pleading SHALL be set
9
before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States District Court Judge.
10
11
12
13
14
IV.
Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
on or before November 4, 2016.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before July 24,
2017, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before September 5, 2017.
15
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses1, in writing, on or before August 7,
16
2017, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before August 21, 2017. The written designation of
17
retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),
18
and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in
19
compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered
20
through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
21
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts
22
and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions
23
included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may
24
include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
25
26
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
27
28
1
In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, the
examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the expert’s
opinions in this regard.
2
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for July 24, 2017 at 8:15 a.m. before the
1
2
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,
3
California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the
4
conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
5
The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be
6
completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this
7
order. Counsel may appear via CourtCall, providing a written notice of the intent to appear
8
telephonically is provided to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk no later than five court
9
days before the noticed hearing date.
10
11
V.
Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later
12
than September 19, 2017, and heard on or before October 17, 2017. Non-dispositive motions are
13
heard before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States
14
Courthouse in Bakersfield, California.
15
No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it
16
is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written
17
discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party
18
with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by
19
agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly
20
shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the
21
obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule
22
this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at
23
(661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251
24
with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped
25
from the Court’s calendar.
26
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than November 3, 2017 and heard no
27
later than December 5, 2017, in Courtroom 5 at 9:30 a.m. before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United
28
States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56
3
1
and Local Rules 230 and 260.
2
VI.
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
3
At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary
4
adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues
5
to be raised in the motion.
6
The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a
7
question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole
8
or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the
9
issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the
10
expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed
11
12
statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of
13
undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be
14
deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint
15
statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred
16
17
as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to
18
comply may result in the motion being stricken.
19
VII.
Pre-Trial Conference Date
20
January 23, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before Judge Drozd.
21
The parties are ordered to file a joint pretrial statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).
22
The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,
23
directly to Judge Drozd's chambers, by email at DADorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
24
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
25
Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.
26
The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
27
Local Rules the joint pretrial statement shall include a joint statement of the case to be used by the
28
Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.
4
1
VIII. Trial Date
March 20, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United
2
3
States District Court Judge.
4
A.
This is a jury trial.
5
B.
Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 4-6 days.
6
C.
Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
7
California, Rule 285.
8
IX.
Settlement Conference
9
A settlement conference is scheduled for September 11, 2017 at 9:30 a.m., located at 510 19th
10
Street, Bakersfield, California. Despite the provisions of Local Rule 270(b), the settlement conference
11
will be conducted by Magistrate Judge Thurston. If any party prefers that the settlement conference
12
is conducted by a judicial officer not already assigned to this case, that party is directed to notify
13
the Court at least 60 days in advance of the scheduled settlement conference to allow sufficient
14
time for another judicial officer to be assigned to handle the conference.
15
Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall
16
appear at the settlement conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority
17
to negotiate and settle the case on any terms2 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a
18
serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the
19
procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.
20
At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via
21
fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful3 settlement demand which includes a
22
brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the
23
settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or
24
25
26
27
28
2
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the
authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent
demand.
3
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should
trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the
settlement conference via stipulation.
5
1
with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is
2
appropriate.
3
If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their
4
confidential settlement conference statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall not
5
be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
6
At least five court days before the settlement conference, the parties shall submit, directly to
7
8
Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov, a confidential settlement
9
conference statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on
10
any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of settlement conference statement.
11
Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the settlement
12
conference indicated prominently thereon.
13
The confidential settlement conference statement shall include the following:
14
A.
A brief statement of the facts of the case.
15
B.
A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which
16
the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on
17
the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.
18
C.
A summary of the proceedings to date.
19
D.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.
20
E.
The relief sought.
21
F.
The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of
past settlement discussions, offers and demands.
22
23
X.
Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other
24
Techniques to Shorten Trial
25
Not applicable at this time.
26
XI.
There are no pending related matters.
27
28
Related Matters Pending
///
6
1
2
XII.
Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
3
and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any
4
amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently
5
handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided
6
in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
7
California.
8
XIII. Effect of this Order
9
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
10
suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the
11
parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
12
to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by
13
subsequent status conference.
14
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
15
showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations
16
extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by
17
affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause
18
for granting the relief requested.
19
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 18, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?