Jason O'Neal v. County of Tulare et al

Filing 18

ORDER, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, dismissing the second cause of action of the complaint, with prejudice. The respective parties shall each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees as to the second cause of action, only. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/14/2017. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JAMES O’NEAL, 10 11 12 Case No. 1:16-cv-01027-AWI-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION OF THE COMPLAINT v. (ECF No. 16) COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 On August 11, 2017, Plaintiff filed a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties to this 17 action to dismiss the second cause of action of the complaint with prejudice. (ECF No. 16.) In 18 light of the stipulation, the second cause of action has been dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th 20 Cir. 1999). 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, 22 the second cause of action of the complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The respective parties 23 shall each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees as to the second cause of action, only. 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 14, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?