Debbie Johnson v. First Riverbank L.P. et al.
Filing
34
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO TAKE DEFENDANTS' DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF (Doc. 33 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/5/2018. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DEBBIE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
TAKE DEFENDANTS’ DEPOSITIONS
AFTER THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF
(Doc. 33)
v.
FIRST RIVERBANK L.P., et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
Case No. 1:16-cv-01028-AWI-BAM
On March 2, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation agreeing to continue the depositions of
Defendants Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc., First Riverbank L.P, and Browman Development
Company, Inc. to a mutually convenient and agreed upon time after the discovery cutoff date of
April 16, 2018. (Doc. 33.) The parties have failed to identify good cause for the continuance
and modification of the scheduling order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4).
Nevertheless, the Court is cognizant of the procedural posture of this case, including the pending
motion to enforce settlement agreement. (Doc. 23.) The Court therefore finds good cause for
the requested modification.
Accordingly, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the
depositions of Defendants Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc., First Riverbank L.P, and Browman
Development Company, Inc. are continued to a mutually convenient and agreed upon time after
the discovery cutoff deadline. The parties shall file a status report within 7 days following the
decision on the Motion to Enforce Settlement, informing the Court what they intend to do
24
regarding discovery.
25 IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
March 5, 2018
27
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?