York v. CDCR Medical

Filing 25

RULE 16 DISCOVERY ORDER Following Initial Scheduling Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/21/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15

Case No. 1:16-cv-01034-EPG (PC)

DOROTHY YORK,
Plaintiff,

RULE 16 DISCOVERY ORDER
FOLLOWING INITIAL SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE

v.
TOCHI E. EZENWUGO., et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Dorothy York (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

18

in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 21, 2017, the Court
19

held an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Conference”). Plaintiff telephonically appeared on her

20

own behalf. Counsel Daniel Benjamin Alweiss telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendant
21

Tochi E. Ezenwugo.
22

During the conference, the parties discussed the relevant documents in this case and
23

their possible locations. It appeared that most, if not all, relevant documents had already been
24

disclosed. In an effort to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this action,
25

after consideration of factors in Rule 26(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for
26

the reasons discussed at the scheduling conference, the Court orders the parties to produce the
27

following documents within their possession custody and control (unless they are aware that
28
1

1

the remaining parties already have possession of those documents): medical records or any

2

other documents concerning the hand injury referenced in the First Amended Complaint.

3

To the extent a party objects to production of any documents because they are

4

privileged or confidential, such party shall inform the other parties of its objection and serve a

5

privilege log as applicable.

6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 21, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2