York v. CDCR Medical

Filing 25

RULE 16 DISCOVERY ORDER Following Initial Scheduling Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/21/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:16-cv-01034-EPG (PC) DOROTHY YORK, Plaintiff, RULE 16 DISCOVERY ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE v. TOCHI E. EZENWUGO., et al., Defendants. 16 17 Dorothy York (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 18 in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 21, 2017, the Court 19 held an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Conference”). Plaintiff telephonically appeared on her 20 own behalf. Counsel Daniel Benjamin Alweiss telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendant 21 Tochi E. Ezenwugo. 22 During the conference, the parties discussed the relevant documents in this case and 23 their possible locations. It appeared that most, if not all, relevant documents had already been 24 disclosed. In an effort to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this action, 25 after consideration of factors in Rule 26(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for 26 the reasons discussed at the scheduling conference, the Court orders the parties to produce the 27 following documents within their possession custody and control (unless they are aware that 28 1 1 the remaining parties already have possession of those documents): medical records or any 2 other documents concerning the hand injury referenced in the First Amended Complaint. 3 To the extent a party objects to production of any documents because they are 4 privileged or confidential, such party shall inform the other parties of its objection and serve a 5 privilege log as applicable. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 21, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?