Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 22

STIPULATION and ORDER for Extension of Time for Defendant to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/25/2017. Based on the above stipulation and good cause appearing therein, the Court grants Defendant an extension of time to file her opposition to Plaintiff's opening brief. Defendant's opposition brief shall be filed no later than May 31, 2017. Plaintiff may file his reply brief no later than June 15, 2017. No further extensions of Defendants deadline will be granted. (Valdez, E)

Download PDF
7 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration TINA L. NAICKER, CSBN 252766 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 268-5611 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Tina.Naicker@SSA.gov 8 Attorneys for Defendant 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRESNO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ERIC BRIAN THOMAS, Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:16-CV-01044-EPG STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, 21 that the time for responding to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be extended for two 22 business days week from May 26, 2017, to May 31, 2017. This is Defendant’s third request for 23 extension. Good cause exists as counsel for Defendant took family medical leave to care for her 24 mother who had surgery on May 19, 2017. Counsel is taking additional leave to take her mother 25 to the doctor following complications from her surgery last week. Counsel for Defendant 26 apologizes for the late request due to unforeseen circumstances which Counsel did not anticipate 27 at the time of the last request. Due to unanticipated circumstances and unscheduled leave, 28 Counsel did not have sufficient time to adequately research the issues raised in Plaintiff’s brief in Joint Stipulation and Order re Extension of Time, Case No. 1:16-CV-01044-EPG 1 1 time for the current deadline. As such, Defendant respectfully requests additional time to 2 respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant makes this request in good 3 faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. 4 5 The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. 6 7 Respectfully submitted, 8 9 Dated: May 24, 2017 /s/ *Cyrsu Safa (*as authorized by email on May 24, 2017) CYRUS SAFA Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: May 24, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 By /s/ Tina L. Naicker TINA L. NAICKER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Joint Stipulation and Order re Extension of Time, Case No. 1:16-CV-01044-EPG 2 ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Based on the above stipulation and good cause appearing therein, the Court grants Defendant an extension of time to file her opposition to Plaintiff’s opening brief. Defendant’s opposition brief shall be filed no later than May 31, 2017. Plaintiff may file his reply brief no later than June 15, 2017. No further extensions of Defendant’s deadline will be granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: May 25, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Joint Stipulation and Order re Extension of Time, Case No. 1:16-CV-01044-EPG 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?