Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER for Extension of Time for Defendant to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/25/2017. Based on the above stipulation and good cause appearing therein, the Court grants Defendant an extension of time to file her opposition to Plaintiff's opening brief. Defendant's opposition brief shall be filed no later than May 31, 2017. Plaintiff may file his reply brief no later than June 15, 2017. No further extensions of Defendants deadline will be granted. (Valdez, E)
7
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
TINA L. NAICKER, CSBN 252766
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 268-5611
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Tina.Naicker@SSA.gov
8
Attorneys for Defendant
1
2
3
4
5
6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
FRESNO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ERIC BRIAN THOMAS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:16-CV-01044-EPG
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
19
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record,
21
that the time for responding to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be extended for two
22
business days week from May 26, 2017, to May 31, 2017. This is Defendant’s third request for
23
extension. Good cause exists as counsel for Defendant took family medical leave to care for her
24
mother who had surgery on May 19, 2017. Counsel is taking additional leave to take her mother
25
to the doctor following complications from her surgery last week. Counsel for Defendant
26
apologizes for the late request due to unforeseen circumstances which Counsel did not anticipate
27
at the time of the last request. Due to unanticipated circumstances and unscheduled leave,
28
Counsel did not have sufficient time to adequately research the issues raised in Plaintiff’s brief in
Joint Stipulation and Order re Extension of Time, Case No. 1:16-CV-01044-EPG
1
1
time for the current deadline. As such, Defendant respectfully requests additional time to
2
respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant makes this request in good
3
faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.
4
5
The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified
accordingly.
6
7
Respectfully submitted,
8
9
Dated: May 24, 2017
/s/ *Cyrsu Safa
(*as authorized by email on May 24, 2017)
CYRUS SAFA
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: May 24, 2017
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
By
/s/ Tina L. Naicker
TINA L. NAICKER
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation and Order re Extension of Time, Case No. 1:16-CV-01044-EPG
2
ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Based on the above stipulation and good cause appearing therein, the Court grants
Defendant an extension of time to file her opposition to Plaintiff’s opening brief. Defendant’s
opposition brief shall be filed no later than May 31, 2017. Plaintiff may file his reply brief no
later than June 15, 2017.
No further extensions of Defendant’s deadline will be granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated:
May 25, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation and Order re Extension of Time, Case No. 1:16-CV-01044-EPG
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?