Williams v. Santiago

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING 24 Findings & Recommendations, DISMISSING Action for Failure to State a Claim, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/19/2019. Case Closed. (Orozco, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. JESSICA SANTIAGO, Unit Supervisor at Coalinga State Hospital, Defendant. No. 1:16-cv-01065-DAD-JDP (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Doc. Nos. 22, 24) 17 18 Plaintiff Michael B. Williams is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 20 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On March 6, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, 22 recommending that plaintiff’s case be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim in his 23 third amended complaint. (Doc. No. 24.) The findings and recommendations were served by 24 mail upon plaintiff at his address of record and contained notice that any objections thereto were 25 to be filed within fourteen (14) days of service. (Id. at 3.) The mail directed to plaintiff was 26 returned to the court as undeliverable on March 15, 2019. Any notice of change of address to be 27 filed by plaintiff was therefore due no later than May 23, 2019. Plaintiff has failed to file a notice 28 of change of address or any objections to the findings and recommendations, and the time in 1 1 2 which to do so has now long since passed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 3 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 4 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 5 analysis. 6 Accordingly, 7 1. 8 9 adopted in full; 2. 10 11 12 13 The findings and recommendations issued on March 6, 2019, (Doc. No. 24), are Plaintiff’s action is dismissed with prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 19, 2019 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?