Williams v. Santiago
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING 24 Findings & Recommendations, DISMISSING Action for Failure to State a Claim, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/19/2019. Case Closed. (Orozco, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
v.
JESSICA SANTIAGO, Unit Supervisor at
Coalinga State Hospital,
Defendant.
No. 1:16-cv-01065-DAD-JDP (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING
ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
CLAIM
(Doc. Nos. 22, 24)
17
18
Plaintiff Michael B. Williams is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
19
in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United
20
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On March 6, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations,
22
recommending that plaintiff’s case be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim in his
23
third amended complaint. (Doc. No. 24.) The findings and recommendations were served by
24
mail upon plaintiff at his address of record and contained notice that any objections thereto were
25
to be filed within fourteen (14) days of service. (Id. at 3.) The mail directed to plaintiff was
26
returned to the court as undeliverable on March 15, 2019. Any notice of change of address to be
27
filed by plaintiff was therefore due no later than May 23, 2019. Plaintiff has failed to file a notice
28
of change of address or any objections to the findings and recommendations, and the time in
1
1
2
which to do so has now long since passed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
3
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
4
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
5
analysis.
6
Accordingly,
7
1.
8
9
adopted in full;
2.
10
11
12
13
The findings and recommendations issued on March 6, 2019, (Doc. No. 24), are
Plaintiff’s action is dismissed with prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to state a
claim; and
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 19, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?