McRae v. Dikran et al

Filing 55

ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's 53 Request for Judicial Notice and his 54 Response to Opposition for Lack of Signature signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/1/2020. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 9 10 11 Plaintiff, vs. BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., 12 1:16-cv-01066-NONE-GSA-PC ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND HIS RESPONSE TO OPPOSITION FOR LACK OF SIGNATURE (ECF Nos. 53, 54.) Defendants. 13 14 Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in 15 forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 16 U.S. 388 (1971). 17 On April 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed a request for judicial notice and a reply to Defendant’s 18 opposition to his motion for leave to amend the complaint. (ECF Nos. 53, 54.) These documents 19 were unsigned. Plaintiff has signed the certificates of service attached to the documents, but 20 he did not sign the documents themselves. All filings submitted to the court must bear the 21 signature of the filing party. Local Rule 131; Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 22 ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for judicial notice and reply to Defendant’s opposition, filed 23 on April 30, 2020, are STRICKEN from the record for lack of signature. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 1, 2020 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?