Dena M. Mills, et al v. Bayer Corp. et al

Filing 9

ORDER DECLINING to Relate Cases signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/17/2017. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
Defendants. 16 17 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 DENA M. MILLS, et al., 13 14 15 No. 1:16-cv-01075-DAD-EPG Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DECLINING TO RELATE CASES BAYER CORP., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 MARGIE ZAMORA, et al., Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 22 No. 2:17-cv-00587-WBS-AC v. BAYER CORP., et al., Defendants. 23 24 On March 23, 2017 and March 25, 2017, defendants filed notices of related cases in the 25 two above-captioned actions, listing a number of cases filed in the Eastern District of California 26 that are purportedly related to Dena M. Mills, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al., 1:16-cv-01075-DAD- 27 EPG. Case Number 1:16-cv-01075-DAD-EPG is the lowest numbered case among these actions, 28 1 1 and was previously assigned to the undersigned. Local Rule 123 permits the judge to whom the 2 lowest numbered case is assigned to reassign all higher numbered related actions to himself or 3 herself, if they determine reassignment is “likely to effect a savings of judicial effort or other 4 economies.” L.R. 123(c). Because Case Number 1:16-cv-01075-DAD-EPG was voluntarily 5 dismissed on October 16, 2016, and no hearings of any kind were held before the court prior to 6 that voluntary dismissal, the undersigned concludes no judicial effort will be saved by relating 7 and re-assigning the subsequently filed cases. Therefore, the court declines to issue an order 8 relating these cases. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: April 17, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?