Stonum v. County of Kern et al

Filing 43

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/14/2017. Consent/Decline due within 10 days. Pleading Amendment Deadline 10/9/2017. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 8/7/2017; Non-Expert 1/19/2018; Expert 2/5/2018. M id-Discovery Status Conference set for 12/11/2017 at 08:45 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 2/20/2018; Hearing by 3/20/2018. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Fi led by 4/3/2018; Hearing by 5/15/2018. Settlement Conference set for 6/22/2018 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 7/23/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Jury Trial set for 9/18/2018 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

DWAYNE STONUM,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14
15

v.
COUNTY OF KERN,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1: 16-CV-01076 - DAD - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 10/9/2017
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 8/7/2017
Non-Expert: 1/19/2018
Expert: 2/5/2018
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
12/11/2017 at 8:45 a.m.

16
17

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 2/20/2018
Hearing: 3/20/2018

18
19

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 4/3/2018
Hearing: 5/15/2018

20
21
22

Settlement Conference:
6/22/2018 at 9:00 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

23
24

26

Pre-Trial Conference:
7/23/2018 at 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 5

27

Trial:

25

28
1

9/18/2018 at 1:00 p.m.

Courtroom 5
Jury trial1: 4-6 days

1
2
3

I.

4
5

Date of Scheduling Conference
July 14, 2017.

II.

Appearances of Counsel

6

Plaintiff Dywane Stonum appeared in pro per.

7

James Brannen appeared on behalf of Defendant.

8

III.

9

Magistrate Judge Consent:
Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing

10

Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of

11

the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set

12

before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older

13

civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a

14

continued date.

15

The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that

16

of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize

17

criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge

18

may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of

19

Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States

20

Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.

21

The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United

22

States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the

23

Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

24

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

25

District of California.

26

The defendants have consented to magistrate judge consent. (Doc. 16) Therefore, the plaintiff

27
28

1

The plaintiff notified the Court he wishes to waive his right to a jury trial. Thus, the Court accepts his jury

waiver.

2

1

is directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to conduct all further proceedings,

2

including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, he SHALL file a consent/decline form

3

(provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating whether he will consent to the

4

jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

5

IV.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

6
7

motion to amend, no later than October 9, 2017. Any motion to amend the pleadings shall be heard by

8

the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States District Court Judge.

9

V.

10
11
12
13
14

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before July 31, 2017.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before
January 19, 2018, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before February 5, 2018.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses2, in writing, on or before December 11,

15

2017, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before January 8, 2018. The written designation of

16

retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),

17

and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in

18

compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered

19

through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

20

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

21

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

22

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

23

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

24
25
26

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for December 11, 2017 at 8:45 a.m. before the

27
28

2

In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, the
examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the expert’s
opinions in this regard.

3

1

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

2

California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the

3

conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to [e-mail].

4

The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be

5

completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this

6

order. Counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing [phone] and entering Access Code

7

1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the

8

intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.

9

VI.

10

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

11

than February 20, 2018, and heard on or before March 20, 2018. Discovery motions are heard before

12

the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States Courthouse in

13

Bakersfield, California. For these hearings, counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing (888)

14

557-8511 and entering Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy

15

Clerk receives a written notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before

16

the noticed hearing date. All other non-dispositive hearings SHALL be set before Judge Drozd.

17

No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it

18

is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written

19

discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party

20

with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by

21

agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly

22

shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the

23

obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule

24

this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at

25

[phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251

26

with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped

27

from the Court’s calendar.

28

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than April 3, 2018 and heard no later
4

1

than May 15, 2018, in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States District Court

2

Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules

3

230 and 260.

4

VII.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

5

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

6

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

7

to be raised in the motion.

8

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

9

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

10

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

11

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

12

expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.

13

The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

14

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

15

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

16

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

17

statement of undisputed facts.

18

In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred

19

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to

20

comply may result in the motion being stricken.

21

VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

22

July 23, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before Judge Drozd.

23

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

24

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

25

directly to Judge Drozd's chambers, by email at [e-mail].

26

Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

27

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

28

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
5

1

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

2

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

3

IX.

September 18, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United

4
5

Trial Date

States District Court Judge.

6

A.

This is a jury trial.

7

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 4-6 days.

8

C.

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

9
10
11

California, Rule 285.
X.

Settlement Conference
A Settlement Conference is scheduled June 22, 2018 at 9:00 a.m., located at 510 19th Street,

12

Bakersfield, California. Notwithstanding the provisions of Local Rule 270(b), the settlement

13

conference will be conducted by Magistrate Judge Thurston. The Court deems the deviation from the

14

Local Rule to be appropriate and in the interests of the parties and justice and sound case management

15

based upon the location of the parties. If any party prefers that the settlement conference is

16

conducted by a judicial officer not already assigned to this case, that party is directed to notify

17

the Court at least 60 days in advance of the scheduled settlement conference to allow sufficient

18

time for another judicial officer to be assigned to handle the conference.

19

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall

20

appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority

21

to negotiate and settle the case on any terms3 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a

22

serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the

23

procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.

24

At least 21 before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via fax or

25
26
3

27
28

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements are
subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the
authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent
demand.

6

1

e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful4 settlement demand which includes a brief

2

explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the

3

settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or

4

with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is

5

appropriate.

6

If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their

7

Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall

8

not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

9
10

At least five court days before the Settlement Conference, the parties shall submit, directly to

11

Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to [e-mail], a Confidential Settlement

12

Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

13

any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference

14

Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the

15

Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.

16

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

17

A.

A brief statement of the facts of the case.

18

B.

A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which

19

the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on

20

the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.

21

C.

A summary of the proceedings to date.

22

D.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.

23

E.

The relief sought.

24

F.

The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of

25

past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

26
27
28

4
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should
trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the
settlement conference via stipulation.

7

1

XI.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

2

Techniques to Shorten Trial

3

Not applicable at this time.

4
5
6
7

XII.

Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

8

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

9

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

10

handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided

11

in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

12

California.

13

XIV. Effect of this Order

14

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

15

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

16

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

17

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

18

subsequent status conference.

19

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

20

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

21

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

22

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

23

for granting the relief requested.

24

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 14, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8