Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
15
ORDER That Plaintiff File A Written Statement Showing Cause Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed or That Plaintiff File An Opening Brief. By no later than June 28, 2017, Plaintiff shall either: a) file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; or b) file an opening brief that conforms with the requirements set forth in the Scheduling Order. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will result in dismissal of this action. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/13/2017. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROSE SANCHEZ,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Case No. 1:16-cv-01081-SKO
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF FILE A
WRITTEN STATEMENT SHOWING
CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED OR THAT PLAINTIFF FILE
AN OPENING BRIEF
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
(Doc. 6)
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
On July 26, 2016, Plaintiff, represented by counsel and in forma pauperis, filed the present
18 action in this Court. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner’s denial of her
19 application for benefits. (Doc. 1.)
20
On January 17, 2017, Plaintiff filed a stipulation to enlarge the time in which to file her
21 confidential letter brief to March 1, 2017, and that all other deadlines set forth in Scheduling Order
22 (Doc. 6) be modified accordingly. (Doc. 14.) Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Plaintiff’s
23 opening brief was due 30 days after Defendant’s response to the confidential letter brief, or May
24 15, 2017. (See Doc. 6 at ¶6.)
25
On May 15, 2017, Plaintiff failed to file and serve her opening brief with the Court and on
26 opposing counsel. (See Docket.) Plaintiff is, therefore, ordered to show cause, if any, why the
27 action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court’s Scheduling Order. (Doc. 6).
28
1 Alternatively, Plaintiff may file an opening brief.
2
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1.
By no later than June 28, 2017, Plaintiff shall either:
4
a.
file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; or
5
b.
file an opening brief that conforms with the requirements set forth in the
6
Scheduling Order.
7
Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will result in dismissal of this action.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10 Dated:
11
June 13, 2017
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?