Newman v. County of Fresno, et al.

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER to Augment the Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/1/2017. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 JILL L. RYTHER MICHELLE V. PAUL RYTHER LAW GROUP 8560 W. Sunset Blvd., Ste. 500 West Hollywood, CA 90069 Telephone 424-272-4706 Fax 310-773-9192 Attorneys for Plaintiff Trisha Newman James D. Weakley, Esq. Bar No. 082853 Leslie M. Dillahunty, Esq. Bar No. 195262 Weakley & Arendt, LLP 1630 East Shaw Ave., Suite 176 Fresno, California 93710 Telephone: (559) 221-5256 Facsimile: (559) 221-5262 Jim@walaw-fresno.com Leslie@walaw-fresno.com Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF FRESNO, also erroneously separately sued as FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, and FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICER HERNANDEZ 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 TRISHA NEWMAN, ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-01099-DAD-MJS ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION TO AUGMENT v. ) SCHEDULING ORDER ) COUNTY OF FRESNO, a public entity; ) FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S ) DEPARTMENT, a public entity; and ) FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S ) OFFICER HERNANDEZ, individually and ) ) in his official capacity, ) ) Defendants. TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 27 28 1 Stipulation to Augment the Scheduling Order 1 2 3 This stipulation is entered into by and between the plaintiff and the defendants, by and through their respective counsel. 1. The parties have been diligent in their efforts to move this case forward. 4 Several depositions have been completed and discovery has been propounded and responded 5 to. Nevertheless, the parties have agreed that they need some additional time to complete 6 discovery and to submit their expert witness declarations. 7 8 9 10 11 12 2. This is the parties’ first request to augment the scheduling order. 3. Based on the foregoing, the parties seek leave to augment the scheduling order as follows: Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff from February 28, 2017, to March 14, 2017. Expert Disclosure from March 7, 2017, to March 21, 2017. Supplemental/Rebuttal Expert Report from April 7, 2017, to April 21, 2017 13 14 15 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, subject to approval by this Court, that the Scheduling Order be augmented as set forth above. 16 17 18 DATED: February 28, 2017 LAW OFFICE OF JILL L. RYTHER 19 By: /s/ Jill L. Ryther _ Jill L. Ryther Attorney for Plaintiff Trisha Newman 20 21 22 DATED: February 28, 2017 WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP 23 24 25 26 By: /s/ Leslie M. Dillahunty__________ Leslie M. Dillahunty James D. Weakley Attorneys for Defendants 27 28 2 Stipulation to Augment the Scheduling Order 1 2 ORDER 3 Good cause appearing, the STIPULATION TO AUGMENT SCHEDULING 4 ORDER in Case No.: 1:16-cv-01099-DAD-MJS is accepted and its terms adopted as 5 the Order of this Court, as follows: 6 1. The deadline for non-expert discovery is extended to March 14, 2017. 7 2. The deadline for initial disclosure of experts is extended to March 21, 2017. 8 9 3. The deadline for Supplemental/Rebuttal Expert disclosures is extended to April 21, 2017 10 11 4. All other dates and deadline shall remain as set forth in the Scheduling Order. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 Dated: March 1, 2017 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation to Augment the Scheduling Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?