Newman v. County of Fresno, et al.
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER to Augment the Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/1/2017. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
JILL L. RYTHER
MICHELLE V. PAUL
RYTHER LAW GROUP
8560 W. Sunset Blvd., Ste. 500
West Hollywood, CA 90069
Telephone 424-272-4706
Fax 310-773-9192
Attorneys for Plaintiff Trisha Newman
James D. Weakley, Esq. Bar No. 082853
Leslie M. Dillahunty, Esq. Bar No. 195262
Weakley & Arendt, LLP
1630 East Shaw Ave., Suite 176
Fresno, California 93710
Telephone: (559) 221-5256
Facsimile: (559) 221-5262
Jim@walaw-fresno.com
Leslie@walaw-fresno.com
Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF FRESNO, also erroneously separately sued as
FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, and FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICER HERNANDEZ
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
TRISHA NEWMAN,
) Case No.: 1:16-cv-01099-DAD-MJS
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION TO AUGMENT
v.
) SCHEDULING ORDER
)
COUNTY OF FRESNO, a public entity;
)
FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
)
DEPARTMENT, a public entity; and
)
FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
)
OFFICER HERNANDEZ, individually and )
)
in his official capacity,
)
)
Defendants.
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
27
28
1
Stipulation to Augment the Scheduling Order
1
2
3
This stipulation is entered into by and between the plaintiff and the defendants, by and
through their respective counsel.
1.
The parties have been diligent in their efforts to move this case forward.
4
Several depositions have been completed and discovery has been propounded and responded
5
to. Nevertheless, the parties have agreed that they need some additional time to complete
6
discovery and to submit their expert witness declarations.
7
8
9
10
11
12
2.
This is the parties’ first request to augment the scheduling order.
3.
Based on the foregoing, the parties seek leave to augment the scheduling order
as follows:
Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff from February 28, 2017, to March 14, 2017.
Expert Disclosure from March 7, 2017, to March 21, 2017.
Supplemental/Rebuttal Expert Report from April 7, 2017, to April 21, 2017
13
14
15
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, subject to approval
by this Court, that the Scheduling Order be augmented as set forth above.
16
17
18
DATED: February 28, 2017
LAW OFFICE OF JILL L. RYTHER
19
By: /s/ Jill L. Ryther
_
Jill L. Ryther
Attorney for Plaintiff Trisha Newman
20
21
22
DATED: February 28, 2017
WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP
23
24
25
26
By:
/s/ Leslie M. Dillahunty__________
Leslie M. Dillahunty
James D. Weakley
Attorneys for Defendants
27
28
2
Stipulation to Augment the Scheduling Order
1
2
ORDER
3
Good cause appearing, the STIPULATION TO AUGMENT SCHEDULING
4
ORDER in Case No.: 1:16-cv-01099-DAD-MJS is accepted and its terms adopted as
5
the Order of this Court, as follows:
6
1. The deadline for non-expert discovery is extended to March 14, 2017.
7
2. The deadline for initial disclosure of experts is extended to March 21, 2017.
8
9
3. The deadline for Supplemental/Rebuttal Expert disclosures is extended to
April 21, 2017
10
11
4. All other dates and deadline shall remain as set forth in the Scheduling
Order.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated:
March 1, 2017
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation to Augment the Scheduling Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?