Phillips 66 Company v. California Pride, Inc., et al.
Filing
29
FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT against California Pride, Inc. re 23 signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/16/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
LAW OFFICES OF DAWN CEIZLER
DAWN CEIZLER, Bar No. 214873
165 Lennon Lane, Suite 101
Walnut Creek, California 94598
Telephone: (925) 932-8225
Facsimile: (925) 226-4849
dc@ceizler.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Phillips 66 Company
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY,
12
Plaintiff,
vs.
13
14
15
CALIFORNIA PRIDE, INC.,
STEVEN COLDREN, AND
REBECCA COLDREN,
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-01102-LJO-SKO
FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT
AGAINST CALIFORNIA PRIDE,
INC. (ECF No. 23)
17
18
In accordance with the Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiff’s
19
Motion for Default Judgment Be Granted in Part as to Defendant California Pride, Inc. (Doc.
20
26), final default judgment is hereby entered in favor of Phillips 66 Company against California
21
Pride, Inc., only. It is hereby
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Phillips 66 Company recover from
22
23
Defendant California Pride, Inc. as follows:
24
1)
Damages in the principal sum of $187,469.39; plus
25
2)
Pre-judgment interest accruing at 12 percent per annum commencing on December
26
1, 2015 through the date of this Final Default Judgment in the total amount of $38,459.471; plus
27
28
1
Prejudgment interest is calculated as follows: ((12% x $187,469.39) ÷ 365) x 624 days =
$38,459.47.
4136268.2
-1-
1
3)
Post-judgment interest in accordance with 28 U.S.C § 1961; plus
2
4)
Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $20,232.34; plus
3
5)
Costs in the amount of $723.30.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
August 16, 2017
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2DEFAULT JUDGMENT 1:16-CV-01102-LJO-SKO
4136268.2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?