Phillips 66 Company v. California Pride, Inc., et al.

Filing 29

FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT against California Pride, Inc. re 23 signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/16/2017. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 LAW OFFICES OF DAWN CEIZLER DAWN CEIZLER, Bar No. 214873 165 Lennon Lane, Suite 101 Walnut Creek, California 94598 Telephone: (925) 932-8225 Facsimile: (925) 226-4849 dc@ceizler.com Attorney for Plaintiff Phillips 66 Company 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, 12 Plaintiff, vs. 13 14 15 CALIFORNIA PRIDE, INC., STEVEN COLDREN, AND REBECCA COLDREN, Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:16-cv-01102-LJO-SKO FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST CALIFORNIA PRIDE, INC. (ECF No. 23) 17 18 In accordance with the Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiff’s 19 Motion for Default Judgment Be Granted in Part as to Defendant California Pride, Inc. (Doc. 20 26), final default judgment is hereby entered in favor of Phillips 66 Company against California 21 Pride, Inc., only. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Phillips 66 Company recover from 22 23 Defendant California Pride, Inc. as follows: 24 1) Damages in the principal sum of $187,469.39; plus 25 2) Pre-judgment interest accruing at 12 percent per annum commencing on December 26 1, 2015 through the date of this Final Default Judgment in the total amount of $38,459.471; plus 27 28 1 Prejudgment interest is calculated as follows: ((12% x $187,469.39) ÷ 365) x 624 days = $38,459.47. 4136268.2 -1- 1 3) Post-judgment interest in accordance with 28 U.S.C § 1961; plus 2 4) Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $20,232.34; plus 3 5) Costs in the amount of $723.30. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ August 16, 2017 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2DEFAULT JUDGMENT 1:16-CV-01102-LJO-SKO 4136268.2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?