Kerzich v County of Tuolumne

Filing 68

ORDER Regarding Settlement Conference (set for September 5, 2018 at 10:00 am before Judge McAuliffe), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/28/2018. PERSONAL Appearance by Plaintiff and Defense Counsel Required. (Valdez, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MARK KERZICH, et. al.,
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-001116-DAD-SAB

12
13

Plaintiff,
v.

14
15

ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

COUNTY OF TOLUMNE,
Defendants.

PERSONAL APPEARANCE BY PLAINTIFF
AND DEFENSE COUNSEL REQUIRED

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

This case is set for a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on
September 5, 2018 at 10:00 am in Courtroom 8 at the U.S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno,
California, 93721. Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the
case shall personally appear at the settlement conference with the parties and the person or persons
having full authority to negotiate and settle the case, on any terms, at the conference.
No later than seven days prior to the settlement conference, each party shall submit directly to
Judge McAuliffe’s chambers at [e-mail], a confidential settlement conference
statement. This statement should neither be filed with the clerk of the Court nor served on any other
party. Each statement shall be clearly marked “CONFIDENTIAL” with the date and time of the

28
1

1

mandatory settlement conference indicated prominently.

2

The settlement statement should not be lengthy but shall include a brief recitation of the facts, a

3

discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the case, an estimate of the cost and time to be expended

4

for further pretrial and trial matters, and the relief sought. The parties are also directed to include a

5

candid statement on the party’s position on settlement, including the amount which the party will

6

accept to settle, realistic settlement expectations, present settlement proposals, and a history of past

7

settlement discussions, offers, demands, and a report on settlement efforts to date.

8

This Court will vacate the settlement conference if the Court finds the settlement conference will

9

be neither productive nor meaningful to attempt to resolve all or part of this case. As far in advance of

10

the settlement conference as possible, a party shall inform the Court and other parties that it believes the

11

case is not in a settlement posture so the Court may vacate or reset the settlement conference. Otherwise

12

the parties shall proceed with the settlement conference in good faith to attempt to resolve all or part of

13

the case.

14
15
16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

August 28, 2018

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2