Proctor v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
42
STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Non-Expert Discovery Deadline, 41 . The deadline for non-expert discovery is continued from September 29, 2017, to November 3, 2017. This modification does not change any other existing scheduling deadlines, including the pretrial conference and trial dates. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/15/2017. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
5
J. RANDALL ANDRADA (SBN 70000)
randrada@andradalaw.com
LYNNE G. STOCKER (SBN 13033)
lstocker@andradalaw.com
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2601
Oakland, California 94612
Tel.: (510) 287-4160
Fax: (510) 287-4161
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant
L. SMALLEY
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
9
FRESNO DIVISION
12
13
KHADAPHI PROCTOR,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
Case No.: 1:16-cv-01120-DAD-SKO
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY
DEADLINE
v.
J. MACIAS, et al.,
(Doc. 41)
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
The parties, by and through their respective counsel, and pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144,
stipulate as follows:
21
1.
That on February 1, 2017, the Court issued its Scheduling Order. ECF No 32.
22
2.
That the non-expert discovery deadline in this action shall be extended from September
23
29, 2017 up to and including November 3, 2017.
24
3.
That there have been no previous extensions of this deadline.
25
4.
That good cause exists for this extension of time because the calendars of the parties’
26
respective counsel, and of the parties, are such that there are few, if any, mutually convenient dates
27
available for the depositions of the parties, and witnesses, between now and September 29, 2017.
28
5.
That the Court has granted Defendants Macias, Short, Curry, Hudson, Jimenez, Santos,
1
STIPULATION FOR EOT RE NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY; ORDER
Proctor v. CDCR, et al.
1:16-cv-01120-DAD-SKO
1
and Ochoa’s unopposed ex parte application to take the deposition of Jacob Eugene Robertson, who is
2
in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation at the Substance Abuse
3
Treatment Facility and State Prison (SATF-CSP) in Corcoran, California. ECF No. 40.
4
6.
That the depositions of Plaintiff and his mother will be taken in San Diego, California
5
and the depositions of any Defendants that Plaintiff elects to depose will be taken at North Kern State
6
Prison in Delano, California, subject to the prison’s availability.
7.
7
8
deadline to November 3, 2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
9
10
The parties respectfully request that this Court extend the non-expert discovery
Dated: August 15, 2017
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
/s/ Lynne G. Stocker
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
11
By:
LYNNE G. STOCKER
Attorneys for Defendant
L. SMALLEY
12
13
I attest that Arthur Mark and Justin Palmer have authorized me to file this document with
14
15
their electronic signatures.
/s/ Lynne G. Stocker
16
17
Dated: August 15, 2017
XAVIER BECERRA
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA
18
/s/ Arthur B. Mark III
By:
19
ARTHUR B.MARK III
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
MACIAS, SHORT, CURRY, HUDSON,
JIMENEZ, SANTOS, and OCHOA
20
21
22
Dated: August 15, 2017
FILER / PALMER, LLP
23
/s/ Justin A. Palmer
By:
24
JUSTIN A. PALMER
Attorneys for Plaintiff KHADAPHI PROCTOR
25
26
//
27
//
28
//
2
STIPULATION FOR EOT RE NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY; ORDER
Proctor v. CDCR, et al.
1:16-cv-01120-DAD-SKO
1
ORDER
2
The Court, having received and reviewed the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Non-Expert
3
Discovery Deadline (Doc. 41), and good cause to modify the Scheduling Order under Fed. R. Civ. P.
4
16(b)(4) having been shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for non-expert discovery is
5
continued from September 29, 2017, to November 3, 2017.
6
7
This modification does not change any other existing scheduling deadlines, including the
pretrial conference and trial dates.
8
9
10
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 15, 2017
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION FOR EOT RE NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY; ORDER
Proctor v. CDCR, et al.
1:16-cv-01120-DAD-SKO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?