Granados v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 28

ORDER for the Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/29/18. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 Jonathan O. Peña, Esq. CA Bar ID No.: 278044 2 Peña & Bromberg, PLC 2440 Tulare Street, 3rd Floor 3 Suite 320 4 Fresno, CA 93721 5 Telephone: 559-412-5390 Facsimile:866-282-6709 6 info@jonathanpena.com 7 Attorney for Plaintiff, Paul Vinton Granados, Jr. 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 PAUL VINTON GRANADOS,JR., Case No. 1:16-cv-1123-GSA 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 14 15 Plaintiff, v. 16 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 17 Defendant. 18 19 TO THE HONORABLE GARY S. AUSTIN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT: 21 The Parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the Court’s approval, 22 stipulate that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the amount of SIX THOUSAND, 23 FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($6,500.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act 24 (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal 25 services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, 26 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). 27 28 1 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will 2 consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to 3 Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability 4 to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset 5 allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After 6 the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are 7 subject to any offset. 8 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury 9 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause 10 the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to counsel, pursuant to the 11 assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s 12 counsel, Jonathan O. Peña. 13 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for 14 15 EAJA fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant 16 under EAJA or otherwise. Payment of SIX THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED 17 DOLLARS ($6,500.00) in EAJA attorney fees, shall constitute a complete release from, 18 and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorney, Jonathan O. Peña, 19 may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. 20 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s attorney to seek Social 21 Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause 22 provisions of the EAJA. 23 24 25 26 Dated: January 23, 2018 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jonathan O. Peña JONATHAN O. PEÑA Attorney for Plaintiff 27 28 -2- 1 Dated: January 23, 2018 2 3 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 4 By: /s/ Ben A. Porter BEN A. PORTER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney (As authorized by e-mail dated January 23, 2018) Attorneys for Defendant 5 6 7 8 9 10 ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 26), Plaintiff shall be awarded 11 attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in 12 the amount of SIX THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($6,500.00). Payment 13 shall be made pursuant to Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010) in accordance with 14 the terms of the stipulation outlined above. 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 29, 2018 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?