Bird v. Wells Fargo Bank

Filing 100

ORDER Directing Clerk to Close Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/13/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5
6
7

Case No. 1:16-cv-01130-DAD-EPG

KIMBERLY SUE BIRD,
Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE
CASE

vs.

(ECF No. 99)

WELLS FARGO BANK,

8

Defendant.

9
10

On December 12, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with

11

prejudice. (ECF No. 99.) All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation,

12

the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice and with fees and costs to be addressed

13

pursuant to the parties’ private agreement. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of

14

San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir.

15

1995) (“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his

16

action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”). Accordingly, the Clerk

17

of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

Dated:

December 13, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1