Silva v. Worth et al
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss 1 Action without Prejudice for Failure to Obey a Court Order and to Pay Filing Fee or File Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; 30-Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/11/2017. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Sant Agata, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 1:16-cv-01131-AWI-SKO (PC)
WORTH, et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER AND
TO PAY FILING FEE OR FILE APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Plaintiff, Anthony Silva, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 2, 2016, an order issued for Plaintiff to submit a
correct application to proceed in forma pauperis, or to pay the filing fee within 45 days. (Doc.
responded to the Court’s order. (Id.) Plaintiff was warned that recommendation for dismissal
would issue if he failed to obey the order. (Id.) Further, on December 2, 2016, an order issued
for Plaintiff to show cause within thirty days why the action should not be dismissed for his
failure to prosecute and comply with the Court’s order. (Doc. 10.) Despite lapse of more than the
allowed time, Plaintiff has failed to file any response.
Despite lapse of more than the time allowed, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise
A civil action may not proceed absent the submission of either the filing fee or a
completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Based on
The proper form was provided with that order for Plaintiff’s use. (See Doc. 6-1, pp. 2-3.)
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s order, dismissal of this action is appropriate. In re
Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006);
Local Rule 110.
Accordingly, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court’s order and to pay the filing fee or file
the correct application to proceed in forma pauperis.
These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within
thirty (30) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file
written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate
Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections
within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772
F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 11, 2017
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?