Langley v. County of Inyo et al

Filing 46

STIPULATION and ORDER 45 to Vacate Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/10/2018. The Settlement Conference set for 12/17/2018 is VACATED. If the ruling on the motion for summary judgment does not fully dispose of the case, within 10 days of the ruling counsel SHALL file a joint statement proposing dates for the settlement conference. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494
Barakah M. Amaral, SBN 298726
350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF INYO and MARGARET KEMP-WILLIAMS
Marguerite Melo, SBN 167782
John Sarsfield, SBN 138971

LAW OFFICE OF MELO AND SARSFIELD LLP
4216 S. Mooney Blvd., PMB 136
Visalia, CA 93277
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff JULIA LANGLEY

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15

JULIA LANGLEY,

16

Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

v.
COUNTY OF INYO, MARGARET KEMPWILLIAMS, in her official and individual
capacity, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

CASE NO. 1:16-cv-01133-DAD-JLT
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO VACATE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
(Doc. 45)

Defendants.
___________________________________/
The parties are scheduled to attend a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge
Jennifer L. Thurston, on December 17, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. The parties request that the Settlement
Conference be vacated.
Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. The hearing on that motion was on
November 6, 2018. An Order following that hearing is pending. On December 5, 2018, the Court
issued an Order vacating the Pre-Trial Conference and the Jury Trial dates. Pending the Court’s
{01932945.DOCX}

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO VACATE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

1

ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment, those dates would be reset. The parties already

2

participated in a mediation. Given the circumstances, the parties request that the currently scheduled

3

Settlement Conference date be vacated. The parties agree that the date can be reset pending the

4

Court’s ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment.

5
6

Dated: December 6, 2018

PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

7
By

/s/Carl L. Fessenden
Carl L. Fessenden
Barakah M. Amaral
Attorneys for Defendants

8
9
10
11

Dated: December 6, 2018

LAW OFFICE OF MELO & SARSFIELD, LLP

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12

By

/s/John Sarsfield (authorized 12/06/18)
Marguerite Melo
John Sarsfield
Attorneys for Plaintiff

13
14
15

[PROPOSED] ORDER

16
17
18
19
20

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause shown:
The Settlement Conference scheduled for December 17, 2018 is taken off calendar. If the
ruling on the motion for summary judgment does not fully dispose of the case, within 10 days of
the ruling, counsel SHALL file a joint statement proposing dates for the settlement conference.

21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

24

December 10, 2018

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
{01932945.DOCX}

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO VACATE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE