Mitchell v. Davey, et al.

Filing 65

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 60 Motion to Withdraw Notice of Appeal and Directing Clerk to Send the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit a Copy of this Order and Plaintiff's Motion signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 08/28/2017. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 JOHN E. MITCHELL, Case No. 1:16-cv-01148-DAD-EPG (PC) USCA Case No. 17-16691 Plaintiff, 12 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW NOTICE OF APPEAL AND DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT A COPY OF THIS ORDER AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. 13 14 15 CRM M.S. ROBICHEAUX and LIEUTENANT THOMPSON, Defendants. 16 (ECF NO. 60) 17 18 John E. Mitchell (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 18, 2017, Plaintiff filed a 20 notice of appeal. (ECF No. 62). On that same day Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw the notice 21 of appeal.1 (ECF No. 60). 22 Plaintiff’s motion is more properly brought before the United States Court of Appeals for 23 the Ninth Circuit. Therefore, the Court will deny the motion and direct the Clerk of Court to send 24 the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals a copy of the motion and this order. 25 Accordingly, based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw the notice of appeal is DENIED, without prejudice; 26 27 28 1 It appears that the notice of appeal was mailed to the Court three days earlier than the motion to withdraw the notice of appeal. 1 1 and 2 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to send the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals a copy of 3 the motion to withdraw the notice of appeal and a copy of this order. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: August 28, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?