Brasher v. Amerigas Propane, Inc.
ORDER RE Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 10/30/2017. Response due by 11/27/2017; Reply due by 12/11/2017.(Flores, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Amerigas Propane, Inc.,
On October 18, 2017, Defendant Amerigas Propane, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 23.) Ordinarily, the setting of oral argument on the
motion would dictate the deadlines for the response and reply. (See LRCiv 230.) In this
case, however, given the visiting status of Judge McNamee, the Court will depart from
the Eastern District of California’s Local Rules and set a deadline for the response and
reply sua sponte. If the Court deems oral argument necessary, it will schedule it at a later
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) by Monday, November 27, 2017.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall reply to Plaintiff’s Response
to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment by Monday, December 11, 2017.
Dated this 30th day of October, 2017.
Honorable Stephen M. McNamee
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?