Riley v. Tallerico et al

Filing 74

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Ruling 67 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/18/2018. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8

Plaintiff,

9
10
11

14

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR RULING

v.

(ECF NO. 67)

TALLERICO and YERRY,
Defendants.

12
13

Case No. 1:16-cv-01189-AWI-EPG (PC)

SHANNON RILEY,

Shannon Riley (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

15

On March 21, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for ruling. (ECF No. 67). Plaintiff asks the

16

Court to rule on his motion for confidential calls (ECF No. 61), his motion for reconsideration

17

(ECF No. 66), and any other motions that were outstanding at the time.

18

Plaintiff’s motion for confidential calls was granted in part (ECF No. 68), and his

19

motion for reconsideration was denied (ECF No. 71). There were no other outstanding motions

20

at the time Plaintiff filed this motion. Therefore, Plaintiffs motions have already been ruled on,

21

and this motion is now moot.

22
23

Accordingly, based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for ruling
is DENIED as moot.

24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 18, 2018

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28

1