Millner v. Woods et al
Filing
36
ORDER Extending Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendant Dr. Hashem 24 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/6/2018. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JAMES MILLNER,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
DR. WOODS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:16-cv-01209-SAB (PC)
ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND
SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANT DR.
HASHEM
[ECF No. 24]
17
18
Plaintiff James Millner is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
19
1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed October 24, 2016, against
20
Defendants Woods and Hashem, in their individual capacities, for deliberate indifference to a serious
21
dental need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 8.)
22
23
On August 24, 2017, Defendant Dr. Woods filed an answer to the first amended complaint.
(ECF No. 15.)
24
On October 27, 2017, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order. (ECF No. 24.)
25
On November 14, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for entry of default as to Defendant Dr.
26
Hashem, on the basis that Defendant Hashem had not responded to the amended complaint. (ECF No.
27
26.) On November 15, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for entry of default as to Defendant
28
Hashem.
1
1
On January 25, 2018, Defendant Hashem filed a motion to set aside the entry of default. (ECF
2
No. 31.) On March 5, 2018, the Court granted Defendant Hashem’s motion, over Plaintiff’s objection.
3
(ECF No. 34.) That same day, Defendant Hashem filed an answer to the first amended complaint.
4
(ECF No. 35.)
5
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the October 27, 2017 discovery and scheduling
6
order is extended and made applicable Defendant Dr. Hashem. Further, all provisions set forth therein
7
remain in full force and effect.
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 6, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?