Millner v. Woods et al

Filing 50

ORDER STRIKING 49 Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/19/2018. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES MILLNER, Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 9 DR. WOODS, et al., Defendants. 10 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-01209-SAB (PC) ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 49] 12 On November 16, 2018, Plaintiff filed a reply to Defendant’s reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to 13 Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 49.) The Court construes this filing as a 14 surreply. 15 No further briefing on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is permitted absent leave of 16 court. The Court did not grant Plaintiff leave to file a surreply, and the Court does not find a surreply 17 necessary. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s surreply (ECF No. 49) is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record. 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 November 19, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?