Jones v. Arnette, et al.
Filing
102
ORDER GRANTING 101 Defendants' Request for Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/31/2021. Defendants are granted an extension of time until 9/1/2021 in which to respond to Plaintiff's second set of requests for production of documents . (Rivera, O)
Case 1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA Document 102 Filed 08/31/21 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JEREMY JONES,
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
vs.
ARNETTE, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
(ECF No. 101.)
SEPTEMBER 1, 2021 -DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
SECOND SET OF REQUESTS FOR
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
15
16
Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
17
with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act
18
(ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. On August 24, 2021, defendants Arnett, Gonzales, Flores, and
19
Keener (“Defendants”) filed a motion for extension of time until September 1, 2021 in which to
20
respond to Plaintiff’s second set of requests for production of documents. (ECF No. 101.)
21
The Court finds good cause to grant Defendants an extension of time. Accordingly, IT
22
IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are granted an extension of time until September 1,
23
2021 in which to respond to Plaintiff’s second set of requests for production of documents.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 31, 2021
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?