Jones v. Arnette, et al.

Filing 129

ORDER DENYING 126 Plaintiff's Motion for Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 07/14/2022. (Maldonado, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JEREMY JONES,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.

1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
(ECF No. 126.)

ARNETTE, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21

Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act

22

(ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s ADA claims against

23

defendants Vasquez, Keener, Gonzalez, Flores, Arnett, Zamora, and Lopez; Plaintiff’s Eighth

24

Amendment claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener and Gonzalez; and, Plaintiff’s due

25
26
27
28

process claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener, and Gonzalez.
On June 6, 2022, Plaintiff filed a request for the Court to schedule this case for a
settlement conference. (ECF No. 126.) The Court shall not require Defendants to attend a
settlement conference at this stage of the proceedings. On July 5, 2022, Defendants notified the
1

1

Court that they do not believe settlement in this case is a possibility, and they are not presently

2

interested in having a settlement conference scheduled by the Court in this case. (ECF No. 128.)

3

Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion shall be denied.

4
5

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for a settlement
conference, filed on June 6, 2022, is DENIED.

6
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 14, 2022

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2