Patterson v. Martinez

Filing 12

ORDER for Respondent to File an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Moiton to Amend, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/30/16. (Case Management Deadline: 10/7/2016) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 VESTER L. PATTERSON, 10 Case No. 1:16-cv-01215-SAB-HC Petitioner, 11 ORDER FOR RESPONDENT TO FILE AN OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO MOTION TO AMEND v. 12 JOEL MARTINEZ, 13 (ECF No. 11) Respondent. 14 15 Petitioner is state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 16 17 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 30, 2016, the Court directed the Clerk of Court to serve 18 the petition on Respondent and ordered Respondent to file a response. (ECF No. 4). On 1 19 September 26, 2016, Petitioner filed a first amended petition (ECF No. 10) and a motion for an 20 order to direct the Clerk of Court to serve the amended petition (ECF No. 11), which the Court 21 construes as a motion to amend. See Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375, 381–82 (2003) 22 (courts may recharacterize a pro se motion to “create a better correspondence between the 23 substance of a pro se motion’s claim and its underlying legal basis”). A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days after serving it, 24 25 or “if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, 21 days after service of a 26 1 Pursuant to the prison mailbox rule, a pro se prisoner’s legal document is filed “at the time . . . [it is] delivered . . . 27 to the prison authorities for forwarding to the court clerk.” Hernandez v. Spearman, 764 F.3d 1071, 1074 (9th Cir. 2014) (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 28 (1988)). 1 1 responsive pleading.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). But “[i]n all other cases, a party may amend its 2 pleading only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 15(a)(2). Here, the amended petition was filed 27 days after the petition was served, and 4 Respondent has not filed a responsive pleading yet. Therefore, Petitioner may amend the petition 5 only with Respondent’s written consent or the court’s leave. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS Respondent to file an opposition or 6 7 statement of non-opposition no later than October 7, 2016. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: September 30, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?