Osegueda et al v. Stanislaus County Public Safety Center et al

Filing 58

ORDER DISCHARGING Orders to Show Cause 53 56 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/30/20. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARMANDO OSEGUEDA, et al., 12 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-cv-01218-LJO-BAM ORDER DISCHARGING ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE v. STANISLAUS COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER, et al., (Doc. Nos. 53, 56.) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs Armando Osegueda and Robert Palomino filed this action on August 16, 2016. 18 (Doc. No. 1.) On February 5, 2017, a Second Amended Complaint was filed adding David 19 Lomeli and Jairo Hernandez as Plaintiffs. (Doc. No. 22.) On January 29, 2019, the Court 20 approved the parties’ stipulation to stay this matter pending resolution of the state criminal 21 proceedings against Plaintiffs. (Doc. No. 50.) The Court further directed Plaintiffs to file a 22 written status report every ninety (90) days notifying the Court of the status of the criminal 23 matter. (Id.) 24 On December 27, 2019, after no status reports had been filed, the Court issued an Order to 25 Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with an order of the 26 Court. (Doc. No. 53.) Plaintiffs were required to file either a written response or the required 27 status report by January 10, 2020. (Id.) Plaintiffs did not file a written response or status report 28 as required by the Court’s December 27, 2019 order. Accordingly, on January 29, 2020, the 1 1 Court ordered Plaintiffs’ counsel Amber Hope Gordon to personally appear before the Court on 2 February 12, 2020, to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute 3 and failure to comply with the Court’s orders. (Doc. No. 56.) Counsel was permitted to comply 4 with the Court’s January 29, 2020 Order to Show Cause by filing the required status report by 5 February 10, 2020. (Id.) 6 On January 29, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a status report stating that the criminal proceedings 7 against Plaintiff Osegueda and Plaintiff Palomino are ongoing while the criminal proceedings 8 against Plaintiff Lomeli and Plaintiff Hernandez have been completed. (Doc. No. 54.) Plaintiffs 9 request that the case continue to be stayed pending the outcome of the remaining criminal 10 proceedings. (Id.) 11 In light of Plaintiffs’ status report, the Court will discharge the Orders to Show Cause 12 issued December 27, 2019, and January 29, 2020. However, counsel is reminded of Plaintiffs’ 13 ongoing obligation to file a written status report every ninety (90) days notifying the Court of the 14 status of the criminal matter. Counsel is further cautioned that any future failure to comply with 15 an order of the Court will result in the imposition of sanctions. 16 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s Orders to Show Cause issued 17 December 27, 2019 (Doc. No. 53) and January 29, 2020 (Doc. No. 56) are HEREBY 18 DISCHARGED. No sanctions will be imposed and counsel is not required to personally appear 19 before the Court on February 21, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: /s/ Barbara January 30, 2020 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?