Osegueda et al v. Stanislaus County Public Safety Center et al
Filing
58
ORDER DISCHARGING Orders to Show Cause 53 56 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/30/20. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ARMANDO OSEGUEDA, et al.,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 1:16-cv-01218-LJO-BAM
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDERS TO
SHOW CAUSE
v.
STANISLAUS COUNTY PUBLIC
SAFETY CENTER, et al.,
(Doc. Nos. 53, 56.)
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiffs Armando Osegueda and Robert Palomino filed this action on August 16, 2016.
18
(Doc. No. 1.) On February 5, 2017, a Second Amended Complaint was filed adding David
19
Lomeli and Jairo Hernandez as Plaintiffs. (Doc. No. 22.) On January 29, 2019, the Court
20
approved the parties’ stipulation to stay this matter pending resolution of the state criminal
21
proceedings against Plaintiffs. (Doc. No. 50.) The Court further directed Plaintiffs to file a
22
written status report every ninety (90) days notifying the Court of the status of the criminal
23
matter. (Id.)
24
On December 27, 2019, after no status reports had been filed, the Court issued an Order to
25
Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with an order of the
26
Court. (Doc. No. 53.) Plaintiffs were required to file either a written response or the required
27
status report by January 10, 2020. (Id.) Plaintiffs did not file a written response or status report
28
as required by the Court’s December 27, 2019 order. Accordingly, on January 29, 2020, the
1
1
Court ordered Plaintiffs’ counsel Amber Hope Gordon to personally appear before the Court on
2
February 12, 2020, to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute
3
and failure to comply with the Court’s orders. (Doc. No. 56.) Counsel was permitted to comply
4
with the Court’s January 29, 2020 Order to Show Cause by filing the required status report by
5
February 10, 2020. (Id.)
6
On January 29, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a status report stating that the criminal proceedings
7
against Plaintiff Osegueda and Plaintiff Palomino are ongoing while the criminal proceedings
8
against Plaintiff Lomeli and Plaintiff Hernandez have been completed. (Doc. No. 54.) Plaintiffs
9
request that the case continue to be stayed pending the outcome of the remaining criminal
10
proceedings. (Id.)
11
In light of Plaintiffs’ status report, the Court will discharge the Orders to Show Cause
12
issued December 27, 2019, and January 29, 2020. However, counsel is reminded of Plaintiffs’
13
ongoing obligation to file a written status report every ninety (90) days notifying the Court of the
14
status of the criminal matter. Counsel is further cautioned that any future failure to comply with
15
an order of the Court will result in the imposition of sanctions.
16
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s Orders to Show Cause issued
17
December 27, 2019 (Doc. No. 53) and January 29, 2020 (Doc. No. 56) are HEREBY
18
DISCHARGED. No sanctions will be imposed and counsel is not required to personally appear
19
before the Court on February 21, 2020.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
January 30, 2020
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?