Mugridge v. Schlichting
Filing
10
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF DAVID MUGRIDGE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on October 13, 2016. Motion Hearing currently set for 10/25/2016 has been CONTINUED to 12/15/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Munoz, I)
1
2
3
4
5
Keith M. White #188536
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
Attorneys at Law
499 West Shaw, Suite 116
Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: (559) 248-4820
Facsimile: (559) 248-4830
Attorneys for Defendant
PAUL A. SCHLICHTING
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
DAVID MUGRIDGE,
10
11
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-01225-LJO-SAB
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE PLAINTIFF DAVID
MUGRIDGE=S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v.
12
PAUL A. SCHLICHTING
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
WHEREAS, Plaintiff DAVID MUGRIDGE=s ("Plaintiff"), Motion for Summary Judgment is set
to be heard on October 25, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4;
WHEREAS, Defendant PAUL A. SCHLICHTING (ADefendant@), retained counsel for the first
time on Saturday, October 8, 2016;
WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant have been participated in settlement discussions
since Monday, October 9, 2016;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant wish to focus their efforts and limited resources on resolving
23
this dispute, and/or narrowing issues, and removing barriers to access rather than respond to Plaintiff=s
24
Motion for Summary Judgment and take other action that may be necessary to properly litigate this matter;
25
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant wish additional time to attempt resolution of the matter
26
without incurring fees and costs associated with filing additional pleadings, preparing for and attending
27
the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment as currently scheduled;
28
WHEREAS, the parties wish to conserve the Court's resources and time and not unnecessarily
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER
burden the Court with a matter that may be informally resolved;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff DAVID MUGRIDGE, by and through his counsel of record,
Layne Hayden of Layne Hayden Attorney at Law, and Defendant PAUL A. SCHLICHTING, by and
through his counsel of record, Keith M. White of Coleman & Horowitt, LLP hereby stipulate as follows:
1.
That Plaintiff DAVID MUGRIDGE=s Motion for Summary Judgment set for October 25,
2016, be continued to a date after December 13, 2016 to allow the parties to thoroughly explore the
informal resolution of the matter and for the parties to properly respond to Plaintiff=s complaint,
potentially amend the Complaint (and Scheduling Order), oppose Plaintiff=s Motion for Summary
Judgment and take other action that may be necessary to properly litigate this action if settlement is not
reached.
Dated: October 13, 2016
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
11
12
By:____/s/ Keith M. White______________
KEITH M. WHITE
Attorneys for Defendant,
PAUL A. SCHLICHTING
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
17
Dated: October 13, 2016
LAYNE HAYDEN ATTORNEY AT LAW
18
19
By:____/s/ Layne Hayden______________
LAYNE HAYDEN
Attorney for Plaintiff
DAVID MUGRIDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
(Order on following page.)
26
27
28
K:\LJO\SIGNED_ORDERS\16CV1225.MUGRIDGE.STIP.CONTINUE.MSJ.DOCX
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER
ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Upon reading and reviewing the above Stipulation, and good cause therefor appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1.
The hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment of this matter currently set for October
25, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 be continued to December 15, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4.
If the parties wish to file amended pleadings or otherwise modify the Court=s Scheduling Order, they must
do so by appropriate stipulation and order or motion.
2.
The parties are informed that it is this Court’s practice to review pending motions upon the
expiration of the reply deadline to determine whether a hearing is necessary or would be helpful. The
Court will notify the parties shortly thereafter by minute order whether the motion will be taken under
submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g).
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
October 13, 2016
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
K:\LJO\SIGNED_ORDERS\16CV1225.MUGRIDGE.STIP.CONTINUE.MSJ.DOCX
_____
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?