Mugridge v. Schlichting

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF DAVID MUGRIDGE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on October 13, 2016. Motion Hearing currently set for 10/25/2016 has been CONTINUED to 12/15/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Keith M. White #188536 COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP Attorneys at Law 499 West Shaw, Suite 116 Fresno, California 93704 Telephone: (559) 248-4820 Facsimile: (559) 248-4830 Attorneys for Defendant PAUL A. SCHLICHTING 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAVID MUGRIDGE, 10 11 CASE NO. 1:16-cv-01225-LJO-SAB Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF DAVID MUGRIDGE=S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 12 PAUL A. SCHLICHTING 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 WHEREAS, Plaintiff DAVID MUGRIDGE=s ("Plaintiff"), Motion for Summary Judgment is set to be heard on October 25, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4; WHEREAS, Defendant PAUL A. SCHLICHTING (ADefendant@), retained counsel for the first time on Saturday, October 8, 2016; WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant have been participated in settlement discussions since Monday, October 9, 2016; WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant wish to focus their efforts and limited resources on resolving 23 this dispute, and/or narrowing issues, and removing barriers to access rather than respond to Plaintiff=s 24 Motion for Summary Judgment and take other action that may be necessary to properly litigate this matter; 25 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant wish additional time to attempt resolution of the matter 26 without incurring fees and costs associated with filing additional pleadings, preparing for and attending 27 the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment as currently scheduled; 28 WHEREAS, the parties wish to conserve the Court's resources and time and not unnecessarily 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER burden the Court with a matter that may be informally resolved; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff DAVID MUGRIDGE, by and through his counsel of record, Layne Hayden of Layne Hayden Attorney at Law, and Defendant PAUL A. SCHLICHTING, by and through his counsel of record, Keith M. White of Coleman & Horowitt, LLP hereby stipulate as follows: 1. That Plaintiff DAVID MUGRIDGE=s Motion for Summary Judgment set for October 25, 2016, be continued to a date after December 13, 2016 to allow the parties to thoroughly explore the informal resolution of the matter and for the parties to properly respond to Plaintiff=s complaint, potentially amend the Complaint (and Scheduling Order), oppose Plaintiff=s Motion for Summary Judgment and take other action that may be necessary to properly litigate this action if settlement is not reached. Dated: October 13, 2016 COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP 11 12 By:____/s/ Keith M. White______________ KEITH M. WHITE Attorneys for Defendant, PAUL A. SCHLICHTING 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 17 Dated: October 13, 2016 LAYNE HAYDEN ATTORNEY AT LAW 18 19 By:____/s/ Layne Hayden______________ LAYNE HAYDEN Attorney for Plaintiff DAVID MUGRIDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Order on following page.) 26 27 28 K:\LJO\SIGNED_ORDERS\16CV1225.MUGRIDGE.STIP.CONTINUE.MSJ.DOCX 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Upon reading and reviewing the above Stipulation, and good cause therefor appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment of this matter currently set for October 25, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 be continued to December 15, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4. If the parties wish to file amended pleadings or otherwise modify the Court=s Scheduling Order, they must do so by appropriate stipulation and order or motion. 2. The parties are informed that it is this Court’s practice to review pending motions upon the expiration of the reply deadline to determine whether a hearing is necessary or would be helpful. The Court will notify the parties shortly thereafter by minute order whether the motion will be taken under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill October 13, 2016 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 K:\LJO\SIGNED_ORDERS\16CV1225.MUGRIDGE.STIP.CONTINUE.MSJ.DOCX _____ UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?