Newby v. Applus RTD USA Services, Inc. et al.
Filing
18
ORDER CLOSING CASE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/5/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DUSTIN NEWBY,
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14
APPLUS RTD USA SERVICES, INC.,
15
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:16-CV-1233- JLT
ORDER CLOSING CASE
(Doc. 17)
16
17
The parties agree this matter has been settled and that it may be dismissed. (Doc. 17) Once a notice
18
under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to
19
make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692
20
(9th Cir. 1997). Thus, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as dictated by Rule 41(a).
21
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 5, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?