Newby v. Applus RTD USA Services, Inc. et al.

Filing 18

ORDER CLOSING CASE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/5/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DUSTIN NEWBY, 12 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 APPLUS RTD USA SERVICES, INC., 15 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:16-CV-1233- JLT ORDER CLOSING CASE (Doc. 17) 16 17 The parties agree this matter has been settled and that it may be dismissed. (Doc. 17) Once a notice 18 under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to 19 make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 20 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as dictated by Rule 41(a). 21 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 5, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?