Vargas et al v. Binnewies et al
Filing
82
Order modifying scheduling order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/28/2019. (Nonexpert Discovery due by 6/7/2019; Expert Disclosure due by 6/21/2019; Rebuttal Expert Disclosure due by 7/26/2019; Expert Discovery due by 8/30/2019) The parties are to advise the Court of their interest in a settlement conference by the close of business on May 17, 2019, through an email directed to Courtroom Deputy Michelle Rooney (mrooney@caed.uscourts.gov). (Rosales, O.)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ESTATE OF ARMANDO VARGAS, et al.
No: 1:16-cv-01240-DAD-EPG
11
Plaintiffs,
v.
12
13
DOUG BINNEWIES., et al.,
Defendants.
14
ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING
ORDER
(ECF No. 71)
15
On February 28, 2019, the Court held a status conference. Mr. Jeffrey Eisinger was present
16
telephonically for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Steven Crass was present telephonically for Defendants.1 As
17
discussed during the status conference, and agreed to by the parties, and finding that good cause
18
exists for modifying the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 71),
19
IT IS ORDERED
20
1. The Scheduling Order, entered on July 11, 2018, (ECF No. 71), is modified as follows:
21
22
Event
New Date or Deadline
Nonexpert Discovery Cutoff
June 7, 2019
23
Expert Disclosure Deadline
June 21, 2019
24
Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline
July 26, 2019
Expert Discovery Cutoff
August 30, 2019
25
26
27
28
1
Counsel for the State Defendants was not present. The Court was informed by Plaintiffs’
counsel that the State Defendants and Plaintiffs are in process of settling the case.
1
1
2. All other dates and aspects of the July 11, 2018, Scheduling Order (ECF No. 71),
2
including the dispositive motion deadline, the pretrial conference, and the jury trial date,
3
shall remain in effect.
4
3. The parties are to advise the Court of their interest in a settlement conference by the
5
close of business on May 17, 2019, through an email directed to Courtroom Deputy
6
Michelle Rooney (mrooney@caed.uscourts.gov).
7
4. No further status conference is set in this matter but the parties may reach out to the
8
Court at any time to request a further status conference be set if they believe one is
9
needed.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated:
13
February 28, 2019
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
