Chavez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER for an Extension of Time for Defendant to File Her Responsive Brief (Doc. 17 was filed in error as a MOTION - pleading was Titled - Joint Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule): Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation for a n Extension of Time, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that that Defendant shall have a 60-day extension, or until August 7, 2017, to submit her response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. (Doc. 17). All other dates in the Scheduling Order shall be extended accor dingly. This is the first extension of time requested by Defendant. However, given the lengthy extension, Defendant is warned that any further request for an extension will be denied absent a showing of good cause. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/5/2017. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL, CSBN 230138
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
C. HAY-MIE CHO, CSBN 282259
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 268-5610
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: haymie.cho@ssa.gov
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
FRESNO DIVISION
12
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ADRIANA CHAVEZ,
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,1
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
Case No.: 1:16-cv-01251-BAM
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT
TO FILE HER RESPONSIVE BRIEF
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective
counsel of record, that the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion For Summary
22
23
24
Judgment and/or to file any cross-motion thereto be extended by sixty (60) days. Plaintiff filed
her brief on May 10, 2017 after one extension.
25
26
27
28
1
Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting
Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be
taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security
Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
1
There is good cause for this extension because Defendant needs additional time to draft
1
2
and file her brief due to the heavy workload of Defendant’s attorney assigned to this case.
3
Defendant’s attorney currently has 33 pending District Court cases that are in various stages of
4
litigation, eight of which require imminent briefing, and additionally handles employment and
5
6
privacy matters for the agency.
7
The current due date for Defendant’s motion is June 9, 2017. With the Court’s approval,
8
the new due date would be August 7, 2017. The parties further stipulate that the Court’s
9
Scheduling Order, dated August 30, 2016, shall be modified accordingly.
10
11
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Cyrus Safa
CYRUS SAFA
Attorney for Plainitff
*Authorized via e-mail on June 1, 2017
Dated: June 5, 2017
12
13
14
15
Dated: June 5, 2017
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
16
17
18
By:
19
20
/s/ C. Hay-Mie Cho
C. HAY-MIE CHO
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
21
22
///
23
///
24
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation for an Extension of Time, IT IS HEREBY
3
ORDERED that that Defendant shall have a 60-day extension, or until August 7, 2017, to submit
4
her response to Plaintiff’s Opening Brief. (Doc. 17). All other dates in the Scheduling Order
5
shall be extended accordingly. This is the first extension of time requested by Defendant.
6
However, given the lengthy extension, Defendant is warned that any further request for an
7
extension will be denied absent a showing of good cause.
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
June 5, 2017
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?