Chavez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

STIPULATION and ORDER for an Extension of Time for Defendant to File Her Responsive Brief (Doc. 17 was filed in error as a MOTION - pleading was Titled - Joint Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule): Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation for a n Extension of Time, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that that Defendant shall have a 60-day extension, or until August 7, 2017, to submit her response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. (Doc. 17). All other dates in the Scheduling Order shall be extended accor dingly. This is the first extension of time requested by Defendant. However, given the lengthy extension, Defendant is warned that any further request for an extension will be denied absent a showing of good cause. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/5/2017. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL, CSBN 230138 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration C. HAY-MIE CHO, CSBN 282259 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 268-5610 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: haymie.cho@ssa.gov 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRESNO DIVISION 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ADRIANA CHAVEZ, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 17 vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL,1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 18 19 20 21 Case No.: 1:16-cv-01251-BAM STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER RESPONSIVE BRIEF IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion For Summary 22 23 24 Judgment and/or to file any cross-motion thereto be extended by sixty (60) days. Plaintiff filed her brief on May 10, 2017 after one extension. 25 26 27 28 1 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 1 There is good cause for this extension because Defendant needs additional time to draft 1 2 and file her brief due to the heavy workload of Defendant’s attorney assigned to this case. 3 Defendant’s attorney currently has 33 pending District Court cases that are in various stages of 4 litigation, eight of which require imminent briefing, and additionally handles employment and 5 6 privacy matters for the agency. 7 The current due date for Defendant’s motion is June 9, 2017. With the Court’s approval, 8 the new due date would be August 7, 2017. The parties further stipulate that the Court’s 9 Scheduling Order, dated August 30, 2016, shall be modified accordingly. 10 11 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Cyrus Safa CYRUS SAFA Attorney for Plainitff *Authorized via e-mail on June 1, 2017 Dated: June 5, 2017 12 13 14 15 Dated: June 5, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 16 17 18 By: 19 20 /s/ C. Hay-Mie Cho C. HAY-MIE CHO Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 21 22 /// 23 /// 24 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation for an Extension of Time, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that that Defendant shall have a 60-day extension, or until August 7, 2017, to submit 4 her response to Plaintiff’s Opening Brief. (Doc. 17). All other dates in the Scheduling Order 5 shall be extended accordingly. This is the first extension of time requested by Defendant. 6 However, given the lengthy extension, Defendant is warned that any further request for an 7 extension will be denied absent a showing of good cause. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara June 5, 2017 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?