Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
23
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE directing plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court's Scheduling Order. Plaintiff shall file a written response within ten days of service of this order. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/15/2017. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN T. JOHNSON,
1:16-cv-01253-EPG
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
18
19
On August 24, 2016, Plaintiff filed a complaint requesting a review of the
20
Commissioner’s denial of disability benefits. (ECF No. 2). On August 26, 2016, the Court
21
entered a Scheduling Order in this case requiring Plaintiff to file an opening brief within 95 days
22
after service of the administrative record (at the latest). (ECF No. 7). Defendant lodged the
23
administrative record on January 3, 2017. (ECF No. 18). To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an
24
opening brief. Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not
25
be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court's Scheduling Order. Plaintiff shall file a written
26
27
28
response to this Order to Show Cause WITHIN ten (10) days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff
desires more time to file the opening brief, Plaintiff should so state in his response.
1
1
2
Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause within the time specified may result
in dismissal of this action.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 15, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?