Smith v. Hernandez et al

Filing 87

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Strike Motion for Summary Judgment 85 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/7/2018: 21-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DELBERT J. SMITH, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 12 Case No.: 1:16-cv-01267-DAD-SAB (PC) (ECF No. 85) C. HERNANDEZ, et al., Defendants. 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff Delbert J. Smith is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 On October 30, 2018, Defendants Cramer and Zuniga filed a motion for summary 19 judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (ECF No. 81.) 20 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to strike their motion for summary 21 judgment, filed on November 6, 2018. (ECF No. 85.) Defendants seek to strike their summary 22 judgment motion because of certain redaction errors. They have concurrently filed an amended 23 motion for summary judgment, (ECF No. 86), which was also served on Plaintiff on November 24 6, 2018. 25 Based on the foregoing, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 26 1. Defendants’ motion to strike is granted; 27 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment filed on October 30, 2018 is stricken 28 from the record; and 1 Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ 3. 1 2 amended motion for summary judgment within twenty-one (21) days of service. Local Rule 3 230(l); and 4. 4 Plaintiff is warned that the failure to file an opposition or to file a statement of no 5 opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and may 6 result in the imposition of sanctions. Id. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: November 7, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?