Consiglio v. Brown et al
Filing
89
ORDER Regarding In Forma Pauperis Status on Appeal 88 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/20/19. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SAM CONSIGLIO, JR.,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
Case No. 1:16-cv-01268-AWI-SAB (PC)
Appeal No. 19-17496
ORDER REGARDING IN FORMA PAUPERIS
STATUS ON APPEAL
10
EDMUND G. BROWN, et al.,
11
Defendants.
(ECF No. 88)
12
Plaintiff Sam Consiglio, Jr. is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
13
14
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 26, 2019, the Court granted
15
without leave to amend Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissed this
16
action with prejudice. (ECF No. 83.) Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on December 11, 2019.
17
(ECF No. 85.)
On December 18, 2019, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred this matter back to
18
19
this Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should
20
continue for the appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). (ECF No. 88.) The Court finds that the appeal
21
is not frivolous or taken in bad faith. Therefore, Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should not be
22
revoked and should continue for the appeal.
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 20, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?