Young v. Pheiffer

Filing 6

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why Action Should not be Dismissed for Failure to Comply with a Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/20/2016. Show Cause Response due by 11/7/2016.(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

HOWARD YOUNG,
Petitioner,

12
13
14

v.
C. PFEIFFER, Warden,
Respondent.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-01276-JLT (HC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

16
17
18
19
20
21

On September 14, 2016, the Court screened the petition for writ of habeas corpus and
dismissed it for failure to state a claim for relief. The Court directed Petitioner to file an amended
petition within thirty days. The time has passed and Petitioner not responded. The Court warned the
petitioner that his failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this action.
Accordingly, within fourteen days of the date of service of this order, Petitioner SHALL

22

show cause in writing why the action should not be dismissed for failure to follow a court order.

23

Petitioner is advised that his failure to comply will result in the Court dismissing this action

24

pursuant to Local Rule 110.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 20, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE