Jacques v. Lopez, Jr. et al
Filing
38
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to FILE Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment; Twenty-One (21) Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/17/2019. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
MICHAEL JACQUES,
Case No. 1:16-cv-01289-DAD-SAB (PC)
10
Plaintiff,
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
11
v.
12
J. LOPEZ, JR., et al.,
(ECF No. 37)
13
Defendants.
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
14
15
16
Plaintiff Michael Jacques is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
17 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds against Defendants Lopez, Razo, Athie,
18 and Garza for excessive force, against Defendant Vasquez for failing to intervene during the
19 alleged use of excessive force, and against Defendant G. Aro for deliberate indifference to a
20 serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
21
On December 17, 2018, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment under Federal
22 Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on the grounds that there are no genuine issues of material fact in
23 dispute, that Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the favorable termination rule, that Defendants are
24 entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and that Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.
25 (ECF No. 37.) Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for
26 summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d
27 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1988); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411–12 (9th Cir. 1988). (ECF
28 No. 37-2.)
1
Plaintiff’s response was due within twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of
1
2 Defendants’ motion. That deadline has passed, but Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or
3 statement of non-opposition to the motion, nor has he otherwise communicated with the Court.
Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a
4
5 statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ summary judgment motion within twenty-one (21)
6 days.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 Dated:
January 17, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?