Brittbrandt, Inc. v. Chavez et al

Filing 19

ORDER DISMISSING CASE With Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41 signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/5/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BRITTBRANDT, INC.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 1:16-cv-01295-DAD-SAB

v.

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 41

TOMMY CHAVEZ, VANESSA ROMO
CHAVEZ, and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,

16

Defendants.

17
On March 17, 2017, the parties to this action filed a stipulation pursuant to Rule 41 of the

18
19

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking to dismiss this action with prejudice and having the

20

court retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties. (Doc. No. 18.) Under

21

Rule 41, an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff’s request by court order on terms the court

22

deems proper. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). The parties having so stipulated, the court orders this

23

matter dismissed with prejudice. The court shall retain jurisdiction over the matter for the

24

purposes of enforcing the parties’ settlement agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. of

25

/////

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381–82 (1994); Alvarado v. Table Mountain Rancheria, 509 F.3d 1008, 1017

2

(9th Cir. 2007).

3
4
5

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 5, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2