Laneley v. Garcia et al
Filing
57
ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to Submit Supplement to Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/19/2020. Defendants Shall Lodge Videos with the Court Within 14 days. (Rivera, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RANDY LANGLEY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
Case No.: 1:16-cv-01299-NONE-JLT (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO
SUBMIT SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
E. GARCIA; G. COOK,
15
Defendants.
16
Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on March 27, 2020. (Doc. 52.) Plaintiff
17
18
has filed an opposition, to which Defendants have filed a reply. (Docs. 54, 55.) In their motion,
19
Defendants reference videos of the incident at issue. (Doc. 52-1 at 5, 7, 13, 19.) Plaintiff also
20
references the videos in his opposition. (Doc. 54 at 1, 2.) However, no party lodged the videos
21
with the Court. In exhibits to their motion, Defendants provide sheets of paper that note video
22
identification numbers and timestamps (Docs. 52-9–52-15), and they cite to these exhibits in their
23
Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. 52-2 at 2). However, without the videos themselves, or
24
declarations describing the videos, the timestamps are unilluminating.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Accordingly, within 14 days, Defendants SHALL lodge the videos with the Court.
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 19, 2020
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?