Laneley v. Garcia et al

Filing 57

ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to Submit Supplement to Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/19/2020. Defendants Shall Lodge Videos with the Court Within 14 days. (Rivera, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY LANGLEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. Case No.: 1:16-cv-01299-NONE-JLT (PC) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT E. GARCIA; G. COOK, 15 Defendants. 16 Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on March 27, 2020. (Doc. 52.) Plaintiff 17 18 has filed an opposition, to which Defendants have filed a reply. (Docs. 54, 55.) In their motion, 19 Defendants reference videos of the incident at issue. (Doc. 52-1 at 5, 7, 13, 19.) Plaintiff also 20 references the videos in his opposition. (Doc. 54 at 1, 2.) However, no party lodged the videos 21 with the Court. In exhibits to their motion, Defendants provide sheets of paper that note video 22 identification numbers and timestamps (Docs. 52-9–52-15), and they cite to these exhibits in their 23 Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. 52-2 at 2). However, without the videos themselves, or 24 declarations describing the videos, the timestamps are unilluminating. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, within 14 days, Defendants SHALL lodge the videos with the Court. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 19, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?