Guerrero v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. et al

Filing 24

ORDER GRANTING #22 Stipulation to Continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/13/2017. Initial Scheduling Conference CONTINUED to 4/20/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

1 William Turley, Esq. (SBN #122408)
David Mara, Esq. (SBN #230498)
2 Jamie Serb, Esq. (SBN #289601)
THE TURLEY & MARA LAW FIRM, APLC
3 7428 Trade Street
4 San Diego, California 92101
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
6 Attorneys for LUIS GUERRERO,
on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated,
7 and on behalf of the general public.
8
9
10
11
12

Matthew C. Kane (SBN # 171829)
Sabrina A. Beldner (SBN # 221918)
Sylvia J. Kim (SBN # 258363)
MCGUIREWOODS LLP
1800 Century Park East, 8th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-1501
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

13
Attorneys for HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17

19

LUIS GUERRERO on behalf of
himself, all others similarly situated,
and on behalf of the general public,

20

Plaintiff,

21

v.

22

HALLIBURTON ENERGY
SERVICES, INC.; and DOES 1-100,

18

23
24

Case No. 1:16-cv-01300-LJO-JLT
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE THE MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
(Doc. 23)

Defendants.

25
26
27
28

///
Plaintiff LUIS GUERRERO (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant HALLIBURTON ENERGY

Joint Stipulation Requesting Continuance

1

Case No. 1:16-cv-01300-LJO-JLT

1 SERVICES, INC. (“Defendant”) (collectively “the Parties”), by and through their respective
2 counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
3

WHEREAS, on September 7, 2016, Honorable Jennifer J. Thurston set a Mandatory

4 Initial Scheduling Conference in this case for December 2, 2016;
5

WHEREAS, on September 9, 2016, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike

6 Plaintiff’s Complaint;
7

WHEREAS, on November 2, 2016, Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill issued a

8 Memorandum and Decision Order on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff’s
9 Complaint;
10

WHEREAS, on November 3, 2016, Honorable Jennifer J. Thurston continued the Initial

11 Scheduling Conference from December 2, 2016, to January 26, 2017, to allow time for the
12 pleadings to settle;
13

WHEREAS, on November 22, 2016, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint;

14

WHEREAS, on December 6, 2016, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike

15 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint;
16

WHEREAS, on December 7, 2016, in light of the pending Motion to Dismiss, Honorable

17 Jennifer J. Thurston continued the Initial Scheduling Conference from January 26, 2017, to
18 March 16, 2017;
19

WHEREAS, on February 3, 2017, Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill issued a Memorandum

20 and Decision Order on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff’s First Amended
21 Complaint;
22

WHERAS, on February 23, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint;

23

WHEREAS, on March 9, 2017, Defendant informed Plaintiff it will file its Answer to

24 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint on March 9, 2017;
25

WHEREAS, an Initial Scheduling Conference is currently scheduled in this case for

26 March 16, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston;
27

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference issued by

28
Joint Stipulation Requesting Continuance

2

Case No. 1:16-cv-01300-LJO-JLT

1 Honorable Jennifer J. Thurston, the Parties are required to hold a conference twenty (20) days
2 prior to the Mandatory Scheduling Conference and submit a Joint Scheduling Report at least
3 seven (7) days prior to the scheduled conference;
4

WHEREAS, in light of multiple challenges to the pleadings, Plaintiff’s filing of his

5 Second Amended Complaint on February 23, 2017, and Defendant’s intention to file an Answer
6 to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint on March 9, 2017, the Parties are in need of more time
7 to conduct their conference of counsel and prepare a Joint Scheduling Report prior to the Initial
8 Scheduling Conference in this case;
9

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties, by and

10 through their respective counsel, that they respectfully request, subject to the Court’s approval,
11 that the Court continue the Initial Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for March 16,
12 2017, for thirty (35) days to April 20, 2017, or a date more convenient for the Court.
13 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
14 Dated: March 9, 2017

THE TURLEY & MARA LAW FIRM, APLC

15
16

By:

17
18
19

/s/ Jamie Serb_____________________
William Turley
David Mara
Jamie Serb
Attorneys for LUIS GUERRERO,
on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated

20
21

Dated: March 9, 2017

MCGUIREWOODS LLP

22
By:

23
24
25
26

/s/ Sabrina A. Beldner_______________
Matthew C. Kane
Sabrina A. Beldner
Sylvia J. Kim
Attorneys for HALLIBURTON ENERGY
SERVICES, INC.

27
28
Joint Stipulation Requesting Continuance

3

Case No. 1:16-cv-01300-LJO-JLT

1

ORDER

2

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, the mandatory scheduling conference is

3 CONTINUED to April 20, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. The parties shall meet and confer pursuant to
4 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), and file their Joint Scheduling Report seven days
5 before the scheduled Initial Scheduling Conference.
6
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8

Dated:

March 13, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER

4

CASE NO. 1:16-cv-01300-LJO-JLT