Akhund v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/2/16 ORDERING the be CASE TRANSFERRRED to Fresno Division. New Case Number 1:16-cv-1301-BAM. Old Case Number 2:16-cv-2017-DB. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EXETTA E. AKHUND,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-2017 DB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
16
Defendant.
17
18
Plaintiff has filed a complaint seeking judicial review of a final decision of the
19
Commissioner denying plaintiff’s application for benefits and an application to proceed in forma
20
pauperis.
21
Although this action has been filed in the Sacramento Division of the United States
22
District Court for the Eastern District of California, the complaint alleges that plaintiff’s primary
23
residence is in Tulare County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District
24
Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).
25
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
26
division of this court in accordance with Local Rule 120(d) may, on the court’s own motion, be
27
transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the
28
Fresno Division of this court for all further proceedings.
1
1
2
3
4
5
Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of California sitting in Fresno; and
2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned by the
Clerk of the Court and shall be filed at:
6
7
8
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
9
10
Dated: September 2, 2016
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLB:6
DLB1\orders.soc sec\akhund2017.transfer.ord
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?